Keita Namoudou, Lokossou Virgil, Berthe Abdramane, Sombie Issiaka, Johnson Ermel, Busia Kofi
West African Health Organisation (WAHO), 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Muraz Centre, 01 BP 390, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jul 12;15(Suppl 1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0216-6.
Aware of the advantages of a project steering committee (SC) in terms of influencing the development of evidence-based health policies, the West African Health Organisation (WAHO) encouraged and supported the creation of such SCs around four research projects in four countries (Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Senegal and Sierra Leone). This study was conducted to describe the process that was used to establish these committees and its findings aim to assist other stakeholders in initiating this type of process.
This is a cross-sectional, qualitative study of the initiative's four projects. In addition to a literature review and a review of the project documents, an interview guide was used to collect data from 14 members of the SCs, research teams, WAHO and the International Development Research Center. The respondents were selected with a view to reaching data saturation. The technique of thematic analysis by simple categorisation was used.
To set up the SCs, a research team in each country worked with health authorities to identify potential members, organise meetings with these members and sought the authorities' approval to formalise the SCs. The SCs' mission was to provide technical assistance to the researchers during the implementation phase and to facilitate the transfer and use of the findings. The 'doing by learning' approach used by each research team, combined with WAHO's catalytic role with each country's Ministry of Health, helped each SC manage its contextual difficulties and function effectively.
The involvement of technical and financial partners motivated the researchers and ministries of health, who, in turn, motivated other actors to volunteer on the SCs. The 'doing by learning' approach made it possible to develop strategies adapted to each context to create, facilitate and operate each SC and manage its difficulties. To reproduce such an experience, a strong understanding of the local context and the involvement of strong partners are required.
西非卫生组织(WAHO)意识到项目指导委员会(SC)在影响循证卫生政策制定方面的优势,鼓励并支持在四个国家(布基纳法索、尼日利亚、塞内加尔和塞拉利昂)围绕四个研究项目设立此类指导委员会。开展本研究旨在描述设立这些委员会所采用的过程,其研究结果旨在帮助其他利益相关者启动此类过程。
这是一项对该倡议的四个项目进行的横断面定性研究。除了进行文献综述和项目文件审查外,还使用了一份访谈指南,从指导委员会的14名成员、研究团队、西非卫生组织和国际发展研究中心收集数据。选择受访者以达到数据饱和。采用简单分类的主题分析技术。
为设立指导委员会,每个国家的一个研究团队与卫生当局合作,确定潜在成员,组织与这些成员的会议,并寻求当局批准以使指导委员会正式成立。指导委员会的任务是在实施阶段向研究人员提供技术援助,并促进研究结果的传播和应用。每个研究团队采用的“边做边学”方法,结合西非卫生组织与每个国家卫生部的催化作用,帮助每个指导委员会应对其背景困难并有效运作。
技术和财政伙伴的参与激励了研究人员和卫生部,而研究人员和卫生部又激励了其他行为体自愿加入指导委员会。“边做边学”方法使得能够制定适应每种情况的战略,以创建、促进和运作每个指导委员会并应对其困难。要重现这样的经验,需要对当地情况有深入了解并让强有力的伙伴参与进来。