HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis.
HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis.
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Jan-Feb;18(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
To evaluate, among adolescents 10 to 17 years of age with an incident hypertensive blood pressure (BP; ≥95th percentile) at a primary care visit, whether TeenBP, a novel electronic health record-linked clinical decision support tool (CDS), improved recognition of elevated BP, and return for follow-up BP evaluation.
We conducted a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in 20 primary care clinics in a large Midwestern medical group. Ten clinics received the TeenBP CDS, including an alert to remeasure a hypertensive BP at that visit, an alert that a hypertensive BP should be repeated in 1 to 3 weeks, and patient-specific order sets. In the 10 usual care (UC) clinics, elevated BPs were displayed in red font in the electronic health record. For comparisons between CDS and UC we used generalized linear mixed models.
The study population included 607 CDS patients and 607 UC patients with an incident hypertensive BP. In adjusted analyses, at the index visit, CDS patients were more likely to have their hypertensive BP on the basis of ≥2 BP measurements (47.1% vs 27.6%; P = .007) and to have elevated BP (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 796.2) diagnosed (28.2% vs 4.2%; P < .001). In a multivariate model adjusted for age, sex, systolic BP percentile, and visit type, rates for repeat BP measurement within 30 days were 14.3% at TeenBP CDS clinics versus 10.6% at UC clinics (P = .07).
The TeenBP CDS intervention significantly increased repeat BP measurement at the index visit and recognition of a hypertensive BP. Rates for follow-up BP measurement at 30 days were low and did not differ between TeenBP and UC subjects.
在初级保健就诊时发现收缩压(BP)≥第 95 百分位的 10 至 17 岁青少年高血压(BP)患者中,评估一种新的电子病历相关临床决策支持工具(CDS) TeenBP 是否提高了对高血压的识别能力以及高血压的随访评估。
我们在一家大型中西部医疗集团的 20 家初级保健诊所中进行了一项实用的集群随机试验。10 家诊所接受了 TeenBP CDS,包括该诊所此次就诊时重新测量高血压的提醒、1 至 3 周内再次测量高血压的提醒和患者特定医嘱集。在 10 家常规护理(UC)诊所中,电子病历中会用红色字体显示升高的血压。我们使用广义线性混合模型对 CDS 和 UC 进行比较。
研究人群包括 607 名 CDS 患者和 607 名 UC 患者,他们都有新发现的高血压。在调整分析中,在索引就诊时,与 UC 患者相比,CDS 患者更有可能基于≥2 次 BP 测量来确定其高血压(47.1%比 27.6%;P=.007),并且更有可能诊断为高血压(国际疾病分类第 9 版代码 796.2)(28.2%比 4.2%;P<.001)。在调整年龄、性别、收缩压百分位数和就诊类型的多变量模型中,在 TeenBP CDS 诊所中,30 天内再次进行 BP 测量的比例为 14.3%,而在 UC 诊所中为 10.6%(P=.07)。
TeenBP CDS 干预显著增加了指数就诊时的重复 BP 测量和高血压的识别。30 天内的随访 BP 测量率较低,且在 TeenBP 和 UC 患者之间没有差异。