Erdmann Alacoque Lorenzini, Peiter Caroline Cechinel, Lanzoni Gabriela Marcellino de Melo
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017 Jul 13;38(2):e69051. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2017.02.69051.
To compare the profile of nursing research groups registered at the CNPq Research Groups Directory in 2006 and 2016.
Descriptive and documentary analysis, The data has been collected in 2006 and in 2016, with parameterized search with the term "nursing" at the CNPq Research Groups Directory. The selected variables have been organized in a Microsoft Office Exce spreadsheetl.
The research groups have increased from 251 in 2006 to 617 in 2016, with important increase of the number of participants, among students and researchers. There was a decrease of the number of groups without students. However, 22% remain without undergraduate students' participation.
It has been observed an important increase regarding the interest on research activities, when comparing both scenarios. The nursing research groups reflect structural and political advances in generation of science, technology and innovation, however, the undergraduate students' and the foreign researchers' participation should still be encouraged.
比较2006年和2016年在国家科学技术发展委员会（CNPq）研究小组名录中注册的护理研究小组概况。
描述性和文献分析。数据于2006年和2016年收集，在CNPq研究小组名录中使用“护理”一词进行参数化搜索。所选变量已整理到Microsoft Office Excel电子表格中。
研究小组从2006年的251个增加到2016年的617个，学生和研究人员等参与者数量大幅增加。没有学生参与的小组数量有所减少。然而，仍有22%的小组没有本科生参与。
比较这两种情况时，观察到对研究活动的兴趣有显著增加。护理研究小组反映了科学、技术和创新产生方面的结构和政策进步，然而，仍应鼓励本科生和外国研究人员参与。
