Iglič Hajdeja, Doreian Patrick, Kronegger Luka, Ferligoj Anuška
University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Scientometrics. 2017;112(1):153-174. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2386-y. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
Although research collaboration has been studied extensively, we still lack understanding regarding the factors stimulating researchers to collaborate with different kinds of research partners including members of the same research center or group, researchers from the same organization, researchers from other academic and non-academic organizations as well as international partners. Here, we provide an explanation of the emergence of diverse collaborative ties. The theoretical framework used for understanding research collaboration couples embodied in the individual with the and of the research field. We analyze survey data collected from Slovenian scientists in four scientific disciplines: mathematics; physics; biotechnology; and sociology. The results show that while individual characteristics and resources are among the strongest predictors of collaboration, very different mechanisms underlie collaboration with different kinds of partners. International collaboration is particularly important for the researchers in small national science systems. Collaboration with colleagues from various domestic organizations presents a vehicle for resource mobilization. Within organizations collaboration reflects the elaborated division of labor in the laboratories and high level of competition between different research groups. These results hold practical implications for policymakers interested in promoting quality research.
尽管对研究合作已进行了广泛研究,但我们仍缺乏对促使研究人员与不同类型研究伙伴合作的因素的理解,这些伙伴包括同一研究中心或团队的成员、来自同一组织的研究人员、来自其他学术和非学术组织的研究人员以及国际合作伙伴。在此,我们对多样化合作关系的出现给出一种解释。用于理解研究合作的理论框架将个体所体现的因素与研究领域的[此处原文缺失两个并列内容]相结合。我们分析了从斯洛文尼亚四个科学学科的科学家那里收集的调查数据,这四个学科分别是:数学、物理、生物技术和社会学。结果表明,虽然个人特征和资源是合作的最强预测因素之一,但与不同类型伙伴合作的背后机制却大不相同。国际合作对小国科学体系中的研究人员尤为重要。与国内各组织的同事合作是资源调动的一种手段。在组织内部,合作反映了实验室中精细的分工以及不同研究团队之间的高度竞争。这些结果对有志于推动高质量研究的政策制定者具有实际意义。