• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
With whom do researchers collaborate and why?研究人员与谁合作,为什么?
Scientometrics. 2017;112(1):153-174. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2386-y. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
2
Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research.迈向跨学科行动研究的一门科学。
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Sep;38(1-2):63-77. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9060-5.
3
An analysis of national collaboration with Spanish researchers abroad in the health sciences.对西班牙研究人员在国外健康科学领域开展国际合作情况的分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 7;13:67. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0055-2.
4
Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines.跨学科研究与产业合作的形式和种类。
Heliyon. 2020 Mar 13;6(3):e03404. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03404. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Great minds think alike, or do they often differ? Research topic overlap and the formation of scientific teams.英雄所见略同,还是常存分歧?研究主题重叠与科研团队的形成。
J Informetr. 2021 Feb;15(1). doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101104. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
6
Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).第二届理论与产业研讨会会议录(2007年6月12日至14日,奥地利维也纳埃尔温·薛定谔研究所)
J Phys Condens Matter. 2008 Feb 13;20(6):060301. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/06/060301. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
7
Tie strength distribution in scientific collaboration networks.科学合作网络中的纽带强度分布
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Sep;90(3):032804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032804. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system.国家科学体系中的科学合作动态
Scientometrics. 2015;104(3):985-1012. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1585-7. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
Twenty five years of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine - progress and priorities for future of radiation medicine and biology.乌克兰国家医学科学院的二十五年——放射医学与生物学的进展及未来优先事项
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol. 2017 Dec;22:10-14.
10
Consensus document on European brain research.欧洲脑研究共识文件。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;77 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i1-49.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges of biomedical research collaboration in India: Perceptions of Indian and international researchers.印度生物医学研究合作的挑战:印度和国际研究人员的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0305159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305159. eCollection 2024.
2
Early career researchers in health policy and systems research: insights from freelancers in a non-profit organization in the Philippines.卫生政策和体系研究领域的早期职业研究者:来自菲律宾非营利组织自由职业者的见解。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 29;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01142-6.
3
Comprehensive analysis of research related to rehabilitation and COVID-19, hotspots, mapping, thematic evolution, trending topics, and future directions.对与康复和新冠病毒相关的研究、热点、图谱、主题演变、热门话题及未来方向的综合分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Oct 13;28(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01402-1.
4
Role of machine and organizational structure in science.机器和组织结构在科学中的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0272280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272280. eCollection 2022.
5
The evolution and co-evolution of a primary care cancer research network: From academic social connection to research collaboration.初级保健癌症研究网络的演变和共同演变:从学术社会联系到研究合作。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 29;17(7):e0272255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272255. eCollection 2022.
6
Scientific Cooperation and the Co-production of Scientific Outcomes for Physical Activity Promotion: Results From a Transdisciplinary Research Consortium.促进身体活动的科学合作与科学成果的共同产出:一个跨学科研究联盟的成果
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;9:604855. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.604855. eCollection 2021.
7
Great minds think alike, or do they often differ? Research topic overlap and the formation of scientific teams.英雄所见略同,还是常存分歧?研究主题重叠与科研团队的形成。
J Informetr. 2021 Feb;15(1). doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101104. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
8
Scientific globalism during a global crisis: research collaboration and open access publications on COVID-19.全球危机下的科学全球主义:关于新冠疫情的研究合作与开放获取出版物
High Educ (Dordr). 2021;81(5):949-966. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00589-0. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Prevalence of Female Authors in Case Reports Published in the Medical Literature.病例报告发表在医学文献中的女性作者的流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e195000. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5000.
10
Biographical articles in scientific literature: analysis of articles indexed in Web of Science.科学文献中的传记文章:对科学网索引文章的分析
Scientometrics. 2018;117(3):1695-1719. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2923-3. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The stability of co-authorship structures.共同作者结构的稳定性。
Scientometrics. 2016;106(1):163-186. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1790-4. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
2
Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system.国家科学体系中的科学合作动态
Scientometrics. 2015;104(3):985-1012. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1585-7. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
3
Secrecy is increasing in step with competition.随着竞争加剧,保密性也在增强。
Nature. 2003 Apr 24;422(6934):801-2. doi: 10.1038/422801c.

研究人员与谁合作,为什么?

With whom do researchers collaborate and why?

作者信息

Iglič Hajdeja, Doreian Patrick, Kronegger Luka, Ferligoj Anuška

机构信息

University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.

出版信息

Scientometrics. 2017;112(1):153-174. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2386-y. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11192-017-2386-y
PMID:28725095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5486904/
Abstract

Although research collaboration has been studied extensively, we still lack understanding regarding the factors stimulating researchers to collaborate with different kinds of research partners including members of the same research center or group, researchers from the same organization, researchers from other academic and non-academic organizations as well as international partners. Here, we provide an explanation of the emergence of diverse collaborative ties. The theoretical framework used for understanding research collaboration couples embodied in the individual with the and of the research field. We analyze survey data collected from Slovenian scientists in four scientific disciplines: mathematics; physics; biotechnology; and sociology. The results show that while individual characteristics and resources are among the strongest predictors of collaboration, very different mechanisms underlie collaboration with different kinds of partners. International collaboration is particularly important for the researchers in small national science systems. Collaboration with colleagues from various domestic organizations presents a vehicle for resource mobilization. Within organizations collaboration reflects the elaborated division of labor in the laboratories and high level of competition between different research groups. These results hold practical implications for policymakers interested in promoting quality research.

摘要

尽管对研究合作已进行了广泛研究,但我们仍缺乏对促使研究人员与不同类型研究伙伴合作的因素的理解,这些伙伴包括同一研究中心或团队的成员、来自同一组织的研究人员、来自其他学术和非学术组织的研究人员以及国际合作伙伴。在此,我们对多样化合作关系的出现给出一种解释。用于理解研究合作的理论框架将个体所体现的因素与研究领域的[此处原文缺失两个并列内容]相结合。我们分析了从斯洛文尼亚四个科学学科的科学家那里收集的调查数据,这四个学科分别是:数学、物理、生物技术和社会学。结果表明,虽然个人特征和资源是合作的最强预测因素之一,但与不同类型伙伴合作的背后机制却大不相同。国际合作对小国科学体系中的研究人员尤为重要。与国内各组织的同事合作是资源调动的一种手段。在组织内部,合作反映了实验室中精细的分工以及不同研究团队之间的高度竞争。这些结果对有志于推动高质量研究的政策制定者具有实际意义。