Nielsen Torben K, Højgaard Martin, Andersen Jon T, Jørgensen Niklas Rye, Zerahn Bo, Kristensen Bent, Henriksen Trine, Lykkesfeldt Jens, Mikines Kári J, Poulsen Henrik E
Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun;6(3):517-528. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.42.
Ascorbic acid (AA) has cytotoxic properties at concentrations that can only be achieved through intravenous (IV) administration in humans. Treatment with intravenous AA is widely and increasingly used in complementary medicine despite a lack of clinical evidence for the efficacy of this treatment.
This non-comparative, single-center, phase II trial included patients with chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) from an outpatient clinic to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IV AA therapy. Patients received weekly infusions of AA (week 1, 5 g; week 2, 30 g; and weeks 3-12, 60 g) followed by efficacy evaluation at 12 weeks. The primary endpoint for efficacy was a 50% reduction in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. The secondary endpoints included changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), biomarkers of bone metabolism, inflammation and bone scans. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01080352.
Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this study, and 20 completed the efficacy evaluation at 12 weeks. The mean baseline PSA level was 43 µg/L. No patient achieved a 50% PSA reduction; instead, a median increase in PSA of 17 µg/L was recorded at week 12. Among the secondary endpoints, no signs of disease remission were observed. In total, 53 adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Eleven were graded as "serious". Three AEs were directly related to AA, and all of which were related to fluid load.
Infusion with 60 g of AA did not result in disease remission. This study does not support the use of intravenous AA outside clinical trials.
在人类中,只有通过静脉注射(IV)才能达到的浓度下,抗坏血酸(AA)具有细胞毒性。尽管缺乏该治疗疗效的临床证据,但静脉注射AA治疗在补充医学中被广泛且越来越多地使用。
这项非对照、单中心、II期试验纳入了来自门诊诊所的未经化疗的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者,以评估静脉注射AA治疗的疗效和安全性。患者每周输注AA(第1周,5 g;第2周,30 g;第3 - 12周,60 g),然后在12周时进行疗效评估。疗效的主要终点是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平降低50%。次要终点包括健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的变化、骨代谢、炎症生物标志物和骨扫描。Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01080352。
23名患者参与了本研究,20名患者在12周时完成了疗效评估。基线PSA平均水平为43 μg/L。没有患者实现PSA降低50%;相反,在第12周时记录到PSA中位数增加了17 μg/L。在次要终点中,未观察到疾病缓解的迹象。总共记录了53例不良事件(AE)。11例被评为“严重”。3例AE与AA直接相关,所有这些都与液体负荷有关。
输注60 g AA未导致疾病缓解。本研究不支持在临床试验之外使用静脉注射AA。