• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国整形手术后医疗诉讼中所达成和解协议的法律效力分析

Analysis of the Legal Effect of Settlement Agreements Prepared in Medical Litigation Following Plastic Surgery in Korea.

作者信息

Kwon Jung Woo, Park Bo Young, Kang So Ra, Hong Seung Eun

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Arch Plast Surg. 2017 Jul;44(4):283-292. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.4.283. Epub 2017 Jul 15.

DOI:10.5999/aps.2017.44.4.283
PMID:28728323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5533049/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Settlements between doctors and patients provide a solution to complicated disputes. However, some disputes may be renewed as a result of negligence by both parties. The purpose of this study was to review the legal issues that may potentially arise during the preparation of settlement agreements and to propose a list of requirements for ensuring the effectiveness of these settlement agreements.

METHODS

Data from 287 civil cases concerning aesthetic surgery that took place between 2000 and 2015 were collected from a court database in South Korea. Factors that influenced the effectiveness of settlement agreements were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 287 court precedents, there were 68 cases of covenant not to sue. Eighteen cases were dismissed because the settlement agreements were recognized as effective, and 50 cases were sent forward for judgment on their merits because the agreements were not recognized as effective. The types of surgery and types of complications were classified by frequency. We evaluated the geographical distribution of the precedents, the settlement timing, and the effectiveness and economic impact of the settlements. We found that there was no statistically significant relationship among these factors. Four major factors that made a settlement agreement legally effective were identified, and the data showed that fee-free reoperations were not considered by the court in determining the compensation amount.

CONCLUSIONS

When preparing a settlement agreement, it is advisable to review the contents of the agreement rather than to take the preparation of a settlement agreement per se to be legally meaningful.

摘要

背景

医患和解为复杂纠纷提供了解决方案。然而,由于双方的疏忽,一些纠纷可能会再次出现。本研究的目的是回顾和解协议准备过程中可能出现的法律问题,并提出确保这些和解协议有效性的一系列要求。

方法

从韩国的一个法院数据库中收集了2000年至2015年间发生的287起关于美容手术的民事案件的数据。分析了影响和解协议有效性的因素。

结果

在287个法院判例中,有68起不起诉契约案件。18起案件因和解协议被认定有效而被驳回,50起案件因协议未被认定有效而被发回进行实质审判。按频率对手术类型和并发症类型进行了分类。我们评估了判例的地理分布、和解时间以及和解的有效性和经济影响。我们发现这些因素之间没有统计学上的显著关系。确定了使和解协议具有法律效力的四个主要因素,数据表明法院在确定赔偿金额时不考虑免费再次手术。

结论

在准备和解协议时,建议审查协议内容,而不是认为和解协议本身具有法律意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/16d2e0f6517d/aps-2017-44-4-283f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/686c636c2222/aps-2017-44-4-283f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/800f0e02bde3/aps-2017-44-4-283f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/ad021316c825/aps-2017-44-4-283f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/a98fb7b2a925/aps-2017-44-4-283f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/6c8ea5c44a15/aps-2017-44-4-283f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/16d2e0f6517d/aps-2017-44-4-283f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/686c636c2222/aps-2017-44-4-283f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/800f0e02bde3/aps-2017-44-4-283f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/ad021316c825/aps-2017-44-4-283f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/a98fb7b2a925/aps-2017-44-4-283f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/6c8ea5c44a15/aps-2017-44-4-283f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d0/5533049/16d2e0f6517d/aps-2017-44-4-283f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the Legal Effect of Settlement Agreements Prepared in Medical Litigation Following Plastic Surgery in Korea.韩国整形手术后医疗诉讼中所达成和解协议的法律效力分析
Arch Plast Surg. 2017 Jul;44(4):283-292. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.4.283. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
2
Use of Nondisclosure Agreements in Medical Malpractice Settlements by a Large Academic Health Care System.大型学术医疗保健系统在医疗事故和解中使用保密协议。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1130-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1035.
3
A Legal Analysis of the Precedents of Medical Disputes in the Cosmetic Surgery Field.整形手术领域医疗纠纷判例的法律分析
Arch Plast Surg. 2016 May;43(3):278-83. doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.3.278. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.脊柱手术后的医疗事故诉讼。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):470-475. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16646. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
5
Influencing factors leading to malpractice litigation in radical prostatectomy.导致前列腺癌根治术医疗事故诉讼的影响因素。
J Urol. 2014 Jun;191(6):1770-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
6
Informed Consent as a Litigation Strategy in the Field of Aesthetic Surgery: An Analysis Based on Court Precedents.作为美容外科领域诉讼策略的知情同意:基于法院判例的分析
Arch Plast Surg. 2016 Sep;43(5):402-10. doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.402. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
7
Analysis of Judicial Precedents Cases Regarding Skin Cancer from 1997 to 2017 in Republic of Korea.1997年至2017年韩国皮肤癌司法判例案件分析。
Ann Dermatol. 2019 Jun;31(3):300-306. doi: 10.5021/ad.2019.31.3.300. Epub 2019 May 1.
8
A look inside the courtroom: an analysis of 292 cosmetic breast surgery medical malpractice cases.法庭内幕:292 例美容乳房手术医疗事故分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):79-86. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13515702.
9
From the operating room to the courtroom: a comprehensive characterization of litigation related to facial plastic surgery procedures.从手术室到法庭:全面描述与面部整形手术相关的诉讼案件。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Aug;123(8):1849-53. doi: 10.1002/lary.23905. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
10
Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis.副神经手术损伤后的医疗事故诉讼:基于证据的分析
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;134(1):102-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.1.102.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulatory frameworks in plastic and cosmetic surgery: a comparative scoping review across Australia, United Kingdom, and Italy.整形与美容外科的监管框架:澳大利亚、英国和意大利的比较范围审查
Gland Surg. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1561-1572. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-244. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
2
Medical malpractice in Oman: A 12-year retrospective record review.阿曼的医疗事故:一项长达 12 年的回顾性病历审查。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0290349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290349. eCollection 2023.
3
A Five-Year Survey for Plastic Surgery Malpractice Claims in Rome, Italy.

本文引用的文献

1
Mammaplasties and medicolegal issues: 50 cases of litigation in aesthetic surgery of the breast.乳房成形术与医学法律问题:50 例乳房美容外科诉讼案例。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Feb;36(1):122-7. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9768-y. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
2
Analysis of medical litigation among patients with medical disputes in cosmetic surgery in Taiwan.台湾美容整形医疗纠纷患者的医疗诉讼分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):764-72. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9684-1. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
3
An introduction to medical malpractice in the United States.
意大利罗马地区整形美容外科医疗纠纷五年调查报告
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 3;57(6):571. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060571.
美国医疗事故简介。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Feb;467(2):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0636-2. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
4
Medical litigation in cosmetic plastic surgery.美容整形手术中的医疗诉讼
Med Law. 2004;23(3):479-88.