Homaie Rad Enayatollah, Yazdi-Feyzabad Vahid, Yousefzadeh-Chabok Shahrokh, Afkar Abolhasan, Naghibzadeh Ahmad
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
School of Management and Medical Informatics, Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Epidemiol Health. 2017 Jul 18;39:e2017029. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2017029. eCollection 2017.
The health transformation program was a recent reform in the health system of Iran that was implemented in early 2014. Some of the program's important goals were to improve the equity of payments and to reduce out-of-pocket (OOP) payments and catastrophic health expenditures (CHE). In this study, these goals were evaluated using a before-and-after analysis.
Data on household income and expenditures in Guilan Province were gathered for the years 2013 and 2015. OOP payments for outpatient, inpatient, and drug services were calculated, and the results were compared using the propensity score matching technique after adjusting for confounding variables. Concentration indices and curves were added to quantify changes in inequity before and after the reform. The incidence of catastrophic expenditures was then calculated.
Overall and outpatient service OOP payments increased by approximately 10 dollars, while for other types of services, no significant changes were found. Inequity and utilization of services did not change after the reform. However, a significant reduction was observed in CHE incidence (5.75 to 3.82%).
The reform was successful in decreasing the incidence of CHE, but not in reducing the monetary amount of OOP payments or affecting the frequency of health service utilization.
健康转型计划是伊朗卫生系统近期的一项改革,于2014年初实施。该计划的一些重要目标是提高支付公平性,减少自付费用(OOP)和灾难性医疗支出(CHE)。在本研究中,使用前后分析对这些目标进行了评估。
收集了吉兰省2013年和2015年的家庭收入和支出数据。计算了门诊、住院和药品服务的自付费用,并在调整混杂变量后使用倾向得分匹配技术对结果进行了比较。添加了集中度指数和曲线以量化改革前后不公平性的变化。然后计算了灾难性支出的发生率。
总体和门诊服务的自付费用增加了约10美元,而其他类型的服务则未发现显著变化。改革后服务的不公平性和利用率没有改变。然而,灾难性医疗支出的发生率显著降低(从5.75%降至3.82%)。
改革成功降低了灾难性医疗支出的发生率,但未能减少自付费用的金额或影响医疗服务利用频率。