Suppr超能文献

两种围产期综合心理社会评估模式比较有效性试验的研究方案:PIPA项目

Study protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial of two models of perinatal integrated psychosocial assessment: the PIPA project.

作者信息

Reilly Nicole, Black Emma, Chambers Georgina M, Schmied Virginia, Matthey Stephen, Farrell Josephine, Kingston Dawn, Bisits Andrew, Austin Marie-Paule

机构信息

Perinatal & Women's Mental Health Unit, St John of God Health Care & University of New South Wales, St John of God Burwood Hospital, 13 Grantham St, Burwood, NSW 2134, Australia.

National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Level 1, AGSM Building (G27), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 20;17(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1354-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies examining psychosocial and depression assessment programs in maternity settings have not adequately considered the context in which psychosocial assessment occurs or how broader components of integrated care, including clinician decision-making aids, may optimise program delivery and its cost-effectiveness. There is also limited evidence relating to the diagnostic accuracy of symptom-based screening measures used in this context. The Perinatal Integrated Psychosocial Assessment (PIPA) Project was developed to address these knowledge gaps. The primary aims of the PIPA Project are to examine the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of two alternative models of integrated psychosocial care during pregnancy: 'care as usual' (the SAFE START model) and an alternative model (the PIPA model). The acceptability and perceived benefit of each model of care from the perspective of both pregnant women and their healthcare providers will also be assessed. Our secondary aim is to examine the psychometric properties of a number of symptom-based screening tools for depression and anxiety when used in pregnancy.

METHODS

This is a comparative-effectiveness study comparing 'care as usual' to an alternative model sequentially over two 12-month periods. Data will be collected from women at Time 1 (initial antenatal psychosocial assessment), Time 2 (2-weeks after Time 1) and from clinicians at Time 3 for each condition. Primary aims will be evaluated using a between-groups design, and the secondary aim using a within group design.

DISCUSSION

The PIPA Project will provide evidence relating to the clinical- and cost- effectiveness of psychosocial assessment integrated with electronic clinician decision making prompts, and referral options that are tailored to the woman's psychosocial risk, in the maternity care setting. It will also address research recommendations from the Australian (2011) and NICE (2015) Clinical Practice Guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12617000932369.

摘要

背景

研究孕期心理社会及抑郁评估项目时,未充分考虑心理社会评估发生的背景,以及综合护理的更广泛组成部分(包括临床医生决策辅助工具)如何优化项目实施及其成本效益。在此背景下,基于症状的筛查措施的诊断准确性相关证据也有限。围产期综合心理社会评估(PIPA)项目旨在填补这些知识空白。PIPA项目的主要目标是研究孕期两种综合心理社会护理替代模式的临床和成本效益:“常规护理”(SAFE START模式)和一种替代模式(PIPA模式)。还将从孕妇及其医疗保健提供者的角度评估每种护理模式的可接受性和感知效益。我们的次要目标是研究孕期使用的多种基于症状的抑郁和焦虑筛查工具的心理测量特性。

方法

这是一项比较效果研究,在两个12个月期间依次将“常规护理”与一种替代模式进行比较。将在时间1(首次产前心理社会评估)、时间2(时间1后2周)收集女性数据,并在每种情况下于时间3收集临床医生数据。主要目标将使用组间设计进行评估,次要目标使用组内设计进行评估。

讨论

PIPA项目将提供与心理社会评估的临床和成本效益相关的证据,该评估与电子临床医生决策提示以及根据女性心理社会风险量身定制的转诊选项相结合,应用于产科护理环境。它还将回应澳大利亚(2011年)和英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(2015年)临床实践指南中的研究建议。

试验注册

ACTRN12617000932369。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f073/5520328/77abf9b762a5/12884_2017_1354_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验