• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对校外居住的学生饮酒者的大学生饮酒者检查的效果。

Efficacy of the College Drinkers Check-Up for Student Drinkers Living Off Campus.

作者信息

Carey Kate B, Balestrieri Sara G, Miller Mary Beth, Merrill Jennifer E, DiBello Angelo M, Benz Madeline B

机构信息

Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Jul;78(4):571-579. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.571.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2017.78.571
PMID:28728639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5551661/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Students living in off-campus housing consume more alcohol and experience more alcohol-related consequences than those living on campus, yet prevention efforts have not targeted this high-risk group specifically. The present study evaluated the efficacy of a brief, computer-delivered, alcohol intervention (the College Drinkers Check-Up [CDCU]) in reducing alcohol use and related consequences in a sample of college students living off campus.

METHOD

Students who lived off campus and reported at least one heavy drinking episode (4+/5+ drinks for females/males in one occasion) in the past 30 days completed the CDCU or assessment only during the first month of the school year (n = 326; 61% female). Participants in both conditions completed follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months. We hypothesized that participants who completed the CDCU would report fewer drinks per week and heavy drinking episodes, lower peak drinking quantities, and fewer alcohol-related consequences than those in the control group.

RESULTS

Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine changes in drinking outcomes across groups from baseline to 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Significant effects of time indicated less drinking and fewer consequences at each follow-up relative to baseline. Compared with those in the control group, participants who received the CDCU reported significantly fewer heavy drinking episodes at 1 month, lower peak drinking quantities at 3 months, and fewer alcohol-related consequences at 1 and 3 months. Neither sex nor baseline drinking severity moderated intervention effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The brief, online CDCU reduces heavy drinking and alcohol consequences in the short term among atrisk college students living off campus.

摘要

目的

与住在校内的学生相比,住在校外的学生饮酒量更大,且经历更多与酒精相关的不良后果,但预防措施尚未专门针对这一高风险群体。本研究评估了一种简短的、通过计算机提供的酒精干预措施(大学生饮酒检查[CDCU])在减少校外居住大学生样本中的酒精使用及相关不良后果方面的效果。

方法

在学年的第一个月,那些住在校外且报告在过去30天内至少有一次酗酒事件(女性/男性一次饮用4杯以上/5杯以上)的学生完成了CDCU或仅进行了评估(n = 326;61%为女性)。两种情况下的参与者均在1、3和6个月时完成了随访评估。我们假设,完成CDCU的参与者每周饮酒量和酗酒事件会比对照组更少,饮酒峰值量更低,与酒精相关的不良后果也更少。

结果

采用分层线性模型来检验从基线到1个月、3个月和6个月随访期间各组饮酒结果的变化。时间的显著影响表明,每次随访时相对于基线饮酒量减少,不良后果也减少。与对照组相比,接受CDCU的参与者在1个月时报告的酗酒事件显著减少,在3个月时饮酒峰值量更低,在1个月和3个月时与酒精相关的不良后果更少。性别和基线饮酒严重程度均未调节干预效果。

结论

简短的在线CDCU在短期内可减少校外居住的高危大学生的酗酒行为及酒精相关不良后果。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of the College Drinkers Check-Up for Student Drinkers Living Off Campus.针对校外居住的学生饮酒者的大学生饮酒者检查的效果。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Jul;78(4):571-579. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.571.
2
Off-Campus Residence as a Risk Factor for Heavy Drinking Among College Students.校外居住作为大学生酗酒的一个风险因素。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jul 29;52(9):1133-1138. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1298620. Epub 2017 May 30.
3
Attendance and alcohol use at parties and bars in college: a national survey of current drinkers.大学生在派对和酒吧的出勤情况及饮酒行为:一项针对当前饮酒者的全国性调查。
J Stud Alcohol. 2002 Nov;63(6):726-33. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.726.
4
Summer Versus School-Year Alcohol Use Among Mandated College Students.强制要求的大学生群体中暑期与学年饮酒情况对比
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jan;77(1):51-7. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.51.
5
Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers.邮寄个性化规范反馈作为对有风险的大学生饮酒者的一种简短干预措施。
J Stud Alcohol. 2002 Sep;63(5):559-67. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.559.
6
Predictors of short-term change after a brief alcohol intervention for mandated college drinkers.强制性大学生饮酒简短干预后短期变化的预测因素。
Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;77:152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
The Effectiveness of Message Framing and Temporal Context on College Student Alcohol Use and Problems: A Selective E-Mail Intervention.信息框架和时间背景对大学生酒精使用及问题的影响:一项选择性电子邮件干预措施
Alcohol Alcohol. 2016 Jan;51(1):106-16. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv091. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
8
Who Will Experience the Most Alcohol Problems in College? The Roles of Middle and High School Drinking Tendencies.谁将在大学中经历最多的酒精问题?初中和高中饮酒倾向的作用。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Oct;39(10):2039-46. doi: 10.1111/acer.12846. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
9
Longitudinal patterns of alcohol mixed with energy drink use among college students and their associations with risky drinking and problems.大学生中酒精与能量饮料混合饮用的纵向模式及其与危险饮酒和问题的关联。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 May;76(3):389-96. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.389.
10
Current Alcohol Use is Associated with Sleep Patterns in First-Year College Students.当前饮酒情况与大学一年级学生的睡眠模式相关。
Sleep. 2016 Jun 1;39(6):1321-6. doi: 10.5665/sleep.5862.

引用本文的文献

1
A quantification of the alcohol use-consequences association in college student and clinical populations: A large, multi-sample study.大学生和临床人群中酒精使用-后果关联的量化:一项大型多样本研究。
Am J Addict. 2018 Mar;27(2):116-123. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12686. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
2
Examining residence status as a risk factor for health risk behaviors among college students.将居住状况作为大学生健康风险行为的一个风险因素进行研究。
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Apr;66(3):187-193. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2017.1406945. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Off-Campus Residence as a Risk Factor for Heavy Drinking Among College Students.校外居住作为大学生酗酒的一个风险因素。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jul 29;52(9):1133-1138. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1298620. Epub 2017 May 30.
2
Drinking Over the Lifespan: Focus on College Ages.一生中的饮酒情况:聚焦大学年龄段
Alcohol Res. 2016;38(1):103-14.
3
Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.针对强制入学大学生的酒精干预措施:一项元分析综述。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jul;84(7):619-32. doi: 10.1037/a0040275. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
4
Summer Versus School-Year Alcohol Use Among Mandated College Students.强制要求的大学生群体中暑期与学年饮酒情况对比
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jan;77(1):51-7. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.51.
5
Single-Session Alcohol Interventions for Heavy Drinking College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对重度饮酒大学生的单次酒精干预:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jul;76(4):530-43. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.530.
6
Efficacy of alcohol interventions for first-year college students: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.针对大学一年级学生的酒精干预措施的效果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):177-88. doi: 10.1037/a0035192. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
7
New research findings since the 2007 Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking: a review.自 2007 年《外科医生总报告:呼吁行动以预防和减少青少年饮酒》发布以来的新研究发现:综述。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Jan;75(1):158-69. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.158.
8
A computer-based feedback only intervention with and without a moderation skills component.基于计算机的反馈干预,包含或不包含调解技能组件。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Jan;46(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
9
Attrition revisited: adherence and retention in a web-based alcohol trial.再谈损耗:一项基于网络的酒精试验中的依从性和保留率
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 30;15(8):e162. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2336.
10
Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & Neighbors (2005).针对大学生酒精滥用问题的个性化反馈干预措施:沃尔特斯与内ighbors(2005年)研究的更新
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Dec;27(4):909-20. doi: 10.1037/a0031174. Epub 2012 Dec 31.