Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI 54751, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Jan;46(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
Research on the efficacy of computer-delivered feedback-only interventions (FOIs) for college alcohol misuse has been mixed. Limitations to these FOIs include participant engagement and variation in the use of a moderation skills component. The current investigation sought to address these limitations using a novel computer-delivered FOI, the Drinkers Assessment and Feedback Tool for College Students (DrAFT-CS). Heavy drinking college students (N=176) were randomly assigned to DrAFT-CS, DrAFT-CS plus moderation skills (DrAFT-CS+), moderation skills only (MSO), or assessment only (AO) group, and were assessed at 1-month follow-up (N=157). Participants in the DrAFT-CS and DrAFT-CS+groups reported significantly lower estimated blood alcohol concentrations (eBACs) on typical heaviest drinking day than participants in the AO group. The data also supported the incorporation of a moderation skills component within FOIs, such that participants in DrAFT-CS+group reported significantly fewer drinks per week and drinks per heaviest drinking occasion than participants in the AO group.
关于计算机提供的仅反馈干预措施（FOIs）对大学生酒精滥用的疗效的研究结果喜忧参半。这些 FOIs 的局限性包括参与者的参与度以及适度技能组件的使用差异。目前的研究旨在使用一种新颖的计算机提供的 FOI，即大学生饮酒评估和反馈工具（DrAFT-CS）来解决这些局限性。大量饮酒的大学生（N=176）被随机分配到 DrAFT-CS、DrAFT-CS+适度技能（DrAFT-CS+）、仅适度技能（MSO）或仅评估（AO）组，并在 1 个月的随访时进行评估（N=157）。与 AO 组相比，DrAFT-CS 和 DrAFT-CS+组的参与者在典型的最重饮酒日报告的估计血液酒精浓度（eBAC）明显较低。数据还支持在 FOIs 中纳入适度技能组件，例如，DrAFT-CS+组的参与者报告每周的饮酒量和最重饮酒时的饮酒量明显少于 AO 组。
