Satija Ambika, Bhupathiraju Shilpa N, Spiegelman Donna, Chiuve Stephanie E, Manson JoAnn E, Willett Walter, Rexrode Kathryn M, Rimm Eric B, Hu Frank B
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 25;70(4):411-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.047.
Plant-based diets are recommended for coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention. However, not all plant foods are necessarily beneficial for health.
This study sought to examine associations between plant-based diet indices and CHD incidence.
We included 73,710 women in NHS (Nurses' Health Study) (1984 to 2012), 92,329 women in NHS2 (1991 to 2013), and 43,259 men in Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986 to 2012), free of chronic diseases at baseline. We created an overall plant-based diet index (PDI) from repeated semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire data, by assigning positive scores to plant foods and reverse scores to animal foods. We also created a healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI) where healthy plant foods (whole grains, fruits/vegetables, nuts/legumes, oils, tea/coffee) received positive scores, whereas less-healthy plant foods (juices/sweetened beverages, refined grains, potatoes/fries, sweets) and animal foods received reverse scores. To create an unhealthful PDI (uPDI), we gave positive scores to less-healthy plant foods and reverse scores to animal and healthy plant foods.
Over 4,833,042 person-years of follow-up, we documented 8,631 incident CHD cases. In pooled multivariable analysis, higher adherence to PDI was independently inversely associated with CHD (hazard ratio [HR] comparing extreme deciles: 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83 to 1.01; p trend = 0.003). This inverse association was stronger for hDPI (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.83; p trend <0.001). Conversely, uPDI was positively associated with CHD (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.46; p trend <0.001).
Higher intake of a plant-based diet index rich in healthier plant foods is associated with substantially lower CHD risk, whereas a plant-based diet index that emphasizes less-healthy plant foods is associated with higher CHD risk.
推荐采用以植物为基础的饮食来预防冠心病(CHD)。然而,并非所有植物性食物都必然对健康有益。
本研究旨在探讨以植物为基础的饮食指数与冠心病发病率之间的关联。
我们纳入了护士健康研究(NHS,1984年至2012年)中的73710名女性、NHS2(1991年至2013年)中的92329名女性以及健康专业人员随访研究(1986年至2012年)中的43259名男性,这些人在基线时均无慢性病。我们根据重复的半定量食物频率问卷数据创建了一个总体的以植物为基础的饮食指数(PDI),给植物性食物赋予正分,给动物性食物赋予反向分数。我们还创建了一个健康的以植物为基础的饮食指数(hPDI),其中健康的植物性食物(全谷物、水果/蔬菜、坚果/豆类、油类、茶/咖啡)得正分,而不太健康的植物性食物(果汁/加糖饮料、精制谷物、土豆/薯条、糖果)和动物性食物得反向分数。为了创建一个不健康的PDI(uPDI),我们给不太健康的植物性食物赋予正分,给动物性食物和健康的植物性食物赋予反向分数。
在超过4833042人年的随访中,我们记录了8631例冠心病发病病例。在汇总的多变量分析中,较高的PDI依从性与冠心病独立呈负相关(比较极端十分位数的风险比[HR]:0.92;95%置信区间[CI]:0.83至1.01;p趋势 = 0.003)。这种负相关在hDPI中更强(HR:0.75;95%CI:0.68至0.83;p趋势<0.001)。相反,uPDI与冠心病呈正相关(HR:1.32;95%CI:1.20至1.46;p趋势<0.001)。
较高摄入富含更健康植物性食物的以植物为基础的饮食指数与显著降低的冠心病风险相关,而强调不太健康植物性食物的以植物为基础的饮食指数与较高的冠心病风险相关。