• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年对初级保健健康风险行为筛查背景下个性化电子反馈的看法:定性研究

Adolescents' Perspectives on Personalized E-Feedback in the Context of Health Risk Behavior Screening for Primary Care: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Zieve Garret G, Richardson Laura P, Katzman Katherine, Spielvogle Heather, Whitehouse Sandy, McCarty Carolyn A

机构信息

Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 20;19(7):e261. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7474.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.7474
PMID:28729236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5544900/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health screening tools for primary care present an opportunity to go beyond data collection to provide education and feedback to adolescents in order to motivate behavior change. However, there is limited research to guide feedback message development.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore youth perceptions of and preferences for receiving personalized feedback for multiple health risk behaviors and reinforcement for health promoting behaviors from an electronic health screening tool for primary care settings, using qualitative methodology.

METHODS

In total, 31 adolescents aged 13-18 years completed the screening tool, received the electronic feedback, and subsequently participated in individual, semistructured, qualitative interviews lasting approximately 60 min. Participants were queried about their overall impressions of the tool, perceptions regarding various types of feedback messages, and additional features that would help motivate health behavior change. Using thematic analysis, interview transcripts were coded to identify common themes expressed across participants.

RESULTS

Overall, the tool was well-received by participants who perceived it as a way to enhance-but not replace-their interactions with providers. They appreciated receiving nonjudgmental feedback from the tool and responded positively to information regarding the consequences of behaviors, comparisons with peer norms and health guidelines, tips for behavior change, and reinforcement of healthy choices. A small but noteworthy minority of participants dismissed the peer norms as not real or relevant and national guidelines as not valid or reasonable. When prompted for possible adaptations to the tool, adolescents expressed interest in receiving follow-up information, setting health-related goals, tracking their behaviors over time, and communicating with providers electronically between appointments.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents in this qualitative study desired feedback that validates their healthy behavior choices and supports them as independent decision makers by neutrally presenting health information, facilitating goal setting, and offering ongoing technological supports.

摘要

背景

基层医疗的电子健康筛查工具为超越数据收集提供了契机,可向青少年提供教育和反馈,以促进行为改变。然而,指导反馈信息开发的研究有限。

目的

本研究旨在采用定性方法,探索青少年对基层医疗电子健康筛查工具针对多种健康风险行为提供个性化反馈以及对健康促进行为给予强化的看法和偏好。

方法

共有31名13 - 18岁的青少年完成了筛查工具,收到了电子反馈,随后参加了时长约60分钟的个人半结构化定性访谈。询问参与者对该工具的总体印象、对各类反馈信息的看法以及有助于促进行为改变的其他功能。通过主题分析,对访谈记录进行编码,以识别参与者表达的共同主题。

结果

总体而言,该工具受到参与者的好评,他们认为这是一种增强而非取代与医疗服务提供者互动的方式。他们赞赏从该工具中获得无评判性的反馈,并对有关行为后果、与同龄人规范和健康指南的比较、行为改变提示以及健康选择强化的信息做出了积极回应。一小部分但值得注意的参与者认为同龄人规范不真实或不相关,国家指南无效或不合理而不予理会。当被问及对该工具可能的改进时,青少年表示有兴趣接收后续信息、设定与健康相关的目标、长期跟踪自己的行为以及在预约之间通过电子方式与医疗服务提供者沟通。

结论

在这项定性研究中,青少年希望获得的反馈能认可他们的健康行为选择,并通过中立地呈现健康信息、促进目标设定和提供持续的技术支持,将他们作为独立决策者给予支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/5544900/fbf35ba4d2ff/jmir_v19i7e261_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/5544900/fbf35ba4d2ff/jmir_v19i7e261_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/5544900/fbf35ba4d2ff/jmir_v19i7e261_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Adolescents' Perspectives on Personalized E-Feedback in the Context of Health Risk Behavior Screening for Primary Care: Qualitative Study.青少年对初级保健健康风险行为筛查背景下个性化电子反馈的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 20;19(7):e261. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7474.
2
Screening and brief intervention for alcohol and other abuse.酒精及其他滥用物质的筛查与简短干预
Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2014 Apr;25(1):126-56.
3
Effect of Electronic Screening With Personalized Feedback on Adolescent Health Risk Behaviors in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.电子筛查与个性化反馈对初级保健环境中青少年健康风险行为的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3581.
4
Electronic Health Risk Behavior Screening With Integrated Feedback Among Adolescents in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial.电子健康风险行为筛查与初级保健中青少年的综合反馈:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 12;23(3):e24135. doi: 10.2196/24135.
5
Adolescents' Perspectives on Using Technology for Health: Qualitative Study.青少年对利用技术促进健康的看法:定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2018 Jan-Jun;1(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/pediatrics.8677. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
Heterosexual female adolescents' decision-making about sexual intercourse and pregnancy in rural Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省农村地区异性恋女性青少年关于性行为和怀孕的决策。
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3664. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
7
Perceived Facilitators of and Barriers to Implementation of a Decision Support Tool for Adolescent Depression and Suicidality Screening: Focus Group and Interview Study.青少年抑郁和自杀倾向筛查决策支持工具实施的感知促进因素和障碍:焦点小组与访谈研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Sep 15;8(9):e26035. doi: 10.2196/26035.
8
Implementation of the BETTER 2 program: a qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators of a novel way to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care.BETTER 2项目的实施:一项定性研究,探索改善初级保健中慢性病预防和筛查新方法的障碍与促进因素。
Implement Sci. 2016 Dec 1;11(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0525-0.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Adolescents' involvement in decision-making for pediatric weight management: A multi-centre, qualitative study on perspectives of adolescents and health care providers.青少年参与儿科体重管理决策:一项多中心定性研究,探讨青少年和医疗保健提供者的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jun;102(6):1194-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences from youth advisors in chronic disease prevention research.慢性病预防研究中青年顾问的经验。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 7;10(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00585-z.
2
Electronic Screening for Adolescent Risk Behaviors in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.电子筛查在急诊科青少年危险行为:一项随机对照试验。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 4;23(6):931-938. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.55755.
3
Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review.数字健康干预措施加强初级保健中的预防工作:范围审查

本文引用的文献

1
Children, Adolescents, and the Media.儿童、青少年与媒体。
Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132(5):958-961. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2656.
2
Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents.学龄儿童和青少年的媒体使用情况。
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2592.
3
A Depression Prevention Intervention for Adolescents in the Emergency Department.急诊科针对青少年的抑郁症预防干预措施。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 21;10(1):e33518. doi: 10.2196/33518.
4
Perceived Facilitators of and Barriers to Implementation of a Decision Support Tool for Adolescent Depression and Suicidality Screening: Focus Group and Interview Study.青少年抑郁和自杀倾向筛查决策支持工具实施的感知促进因素和障碍:焦点小组与访谈研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Sep 15;8(9):e26035. doi: 10.2196/26035.
5
Electronic Health Risk Behavior Screening With Integrated Feedback Among Adolescents in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial.电子健康风险行为筛查与初级保健中青少年的综合反馈:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 12;23(3):e24135. doi: 10.2196/24135.
6
Brief Motivational Interviewing Delivered by Clinician or Computer to Reduce Sexual Risk Behaviors in Adolescents: Acceptability Study.临床医生或计算机进行的简短动机性访谈以降低青少年性风险行为:可接受性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 10;21(7):e13220. doi: 10.2196/13220.
7
Adapting Patient Experience Data Collection Processes for Lower Literacy Patient Populations Using Tablets at the Point of Care.使用平板电脑在床边为低识字率患者人群调整患者体验数据采集流程。
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 6 2):S140-S148. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001030.
8
Effect of Electronic Screening With Personalized Feedback on Adolescent Health Risk Behaviors in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.电子筛查与个性化反馈对初级保健环境中青少年健康风险行为的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3581.
9
Adolescents' Perspectives on Using Technology for Health: Qualitative Study.青少年对利用技术促进健康的看法:定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2018 Jan-Jun;1(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/pediatrics.8677. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Oct;59(4):401-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
4
Women veterans' experience with a web-based diabetes prevention program: a qualitative study to inform future practice.女性退伍军人参与基于网络的糖尿病预防项目的体验:一项为未来实践提供信息的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 25;17(5):e127. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4332.
5
Young People's Views on Electronic Mental Health Assessment: Prefer to Type than Talk?年轻人对电子心理健康评估的看法:更喜欢打字而非交谈?
J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24(5):1213-1221. doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-9929-0.
6
Prompting discussions of youth violence using electronic previsit questionnaires in primary care: a cluster randomized trial.在初级保健中使用电子预检问卷引发青少年暴力问题的讨论:一项整群随机试验。
Acad Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;15(3):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.01.005.
7
Exploring women's beliefs and perceptions about healthy eating blogs: a qualitative study.探索女性对健康饮食博客的信念和认知:一项定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 8;17(4):e87. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3504.
8
Adolescents just do not know what they want: a qualitative study to describe obese adolescents' experiences of text messaging to support behavior change maintenance post intervention.青少年就是不知道自己想要什么:一项质性研究,描述肥胖青少年在干预后通过短信支持行为改变维持的经历。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 8;16(4):e103. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3113.
9
Normative misperceptions of peer seat belt use among high school students and their relationship to personal seat belt use.高中生对同伴系安全带的规范误解及其与个人系安全带使用的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):748-52. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.868892.
10
Adolescent views on comprehensive health risk assessment and counseling: assessing gender differences.青少年对全面健康风险评估与咨询的看法:评估性别差异。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Jul;55(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Mar 6.