• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子筛查在急诊科青少年危险行为:一项随机对照试验。

Electronic Screening for Adolescent Risk Behaviors in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 4;23(6):931-938. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.55755.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2022.7.55755
PMID:36409949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9683771/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In this study we aimed to assess the impact of an electronic health assessment with individualized feedback for risk behaviors in adolescents seeking care in a pediatric emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized control trial using a tablet-based screening program with a study population of adolescents in a busy pediatric ED. The intervention group received the screening program with individualized feedback. The control group received the screening program without feedback. All participants received one-day and three-month follow-up surveys to assess behaviors and attitudes toward health behaviors.

RESULTS

A total of 296 subjects were enrolled and randomized. There was no difference in changes in risky behaviors between the control and experimental groups. A higher proportion of participants in the intervention groups reported that the screener changed the way they thought about their health at one-day follow-up (27.0%, 36/133) compared to the control group (15.5%, 20/129, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

This study successfully tested a multivariable electronic health screener in a real-world setting of a busy pediatric ED. The tool did not significantly change risky health behaviors in the adolescent population screened. However, our finding that the intervention changed adolescents' perceptions of their health opens a door to the continued development of electronic interventions to screen for and target risk behaviors in adolescents in the ED setting.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估电子健康评估与个体化反馈对在儿科急诊就诊的青少年风险行为的影响。

方法

我们采用基于平板电脑的筛查方案,对繁忙儿科急诊的青少年进行了一项随机对照试验。干预组接受了带有个体化反馈的筛查方案,而对照组则接受了无反馈的筛查方案。所有参与者均接受了为期一天和三个月的随访调查,以评估行为和对健康行为的态度。

结果

共纳入并随机分配了 296 名受试者。在控制组和实验组之间,危险行为的变化没有差异。干预组中有更高比例的参与者报告称,筛查器在一天的随访中改变了他们对健康的看法(27.0%,36/133),而对照组中则为 15.5%(20/129,P =.02)。

结论

本研究成功地在繁忙儿科急诊的真实环境中测试了一种多变量电子健康筛查器。该工具并未显著改变筛查出的青少年人群中的危险健康行为。但是,我们发现干预措施改变了青少年对自身健康的看法,为在急诊环境中筛查和针对青少年的风险行为开发电子干预措施开辟了道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/facf/9683771/d32a536b368a/wjem-23-931-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/facf/9683771/d32a536b368a/wjem-23-931-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/facf/9683771/d32a536b368a/wjem-23-931-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Electronic Screening for Adolescent Risk Behaviors in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.电子筛查在急诊科青少年危险行为:一项随机对照试验。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 4;23(6):931-938. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.55755.
2
Electronic Health Risk Behavior Screening With Integrated Feedback Among Adolescents in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial.电子健康风险行为筛查与初级保健中青少年的综合反馈:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 12;23(3):e24135. doi: 10.2196/24135.
3
Adolescent Risk Behavior Screening and Interventions in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.医院环境中的青少年风险行为筛查和干预措施:范围综述。
Pediatrics. 2021 Apr;147(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-020610. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
4
Effectiveness of increasing emergency department patients' self-perceived risk for being human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected through audio computer self-interview-based feedback about reported HIV risk behaviors.通过基于音频计算机自我访谈的反馈,告知急诊患者其报告的 HIV 风险行为,以增加其自我感知感染人类免疫缺陷病毒 (HIV) 的风险,从而提高其效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1143-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00537.x.
5
Feasibility of a computer-delivered driver safety behavior screening and intervention program initiated during an emergency department visit.在急诊科就诊期间,开展计算机驱动的驾驶员安全行为筛查和干预计划的可行性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(1):39-45. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.690545.
6
Adolescents' Acceptance of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception After an Educational Intervention in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.青少年在急诊科接受教育干预后对长效可逆避孕措施的接受度:一项随机对照试验。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 21;21(3):640-646. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.2.45433.
7
A randomized controlled trial to engage in care of adolescent emergency department patients with mental health problems that increase suicide risk.一项随机对照试验,旨在参与对有增加自杀风险的心理健康问题的青少年急诊科患者的护理。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1263-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182767ac8.
8
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Text Message-Based Intervention to Reduce Overuse of Alcohol in Emergency Department Patients: Controlled Proof-of-Concept Trial.基于短信的干预措施减少急诊科患者过度饮酒的可行性和可接受性:对照概念验证试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 4;8(6):e17557. doi: 10.2196/17557.
9
Adolescents' preference for technology-based emergency department behavioral interventions: does it depend on risky behaviors?青少年对基于技术的急诊科行为干预措施的偏好:这是否取决于危险行为?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Apr;29(4):475-81. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828a322f.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic Screening, Feedback, and Clinician Training in Adolescent Primary Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.电子筛查、反馈和临床医生培训在青少年初级保健中的应用:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Feb;70(2):234-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.07.019. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
Acceptability of Adolescent Social and Behavioral Health Screening in the Emergency Department.急诊室中青少年社会和行为健康筛查的可接受性。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Oct;65(4):543-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
3
Effect of Electronic Screening With Personalized Feedback on Adolescent Health Risk Behaviors in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
电子筛查与个性化反馈对初级保健环境中青少年健康风险行为的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3581.
4
Development of a Novel Computerized Clinical Decision Support System to Improve Adolescent Sexual Health Care Provision.开发一种新型计算机临床决策支持系统以改善青少年性健康保健服务。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;26(4):420-433. doi: 10.1111/acem.13570. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2017.青少年风险行为监测 - 美国,2017 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Jun 15;67(8):1-114. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1.
6
Preventive Care Use Among Justice-Involved and Non-Justice-Involved Youth.涉案青年与未涉案青年的预防性保健服务利用情况
Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1107. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
7
Emergency Department and Hospital Use Among Adolescents With Justice System Involvement.涉及司法系统的青少年的急诊科及医院就诊情况
Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1144. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
8
Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization and Reliance by Insurance Coverage in the United States.美国儿童急诊科利用情况及保险覆盖下的依赖程度
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(12):1483-1490. doi: 10.1111/acem.13281. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
Characteristics of youth agreeing to electronic sexually transmitted infection risk assessment in the emergency department.同意在急诊科进行电子性传播感染风险评估的青年特征。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206199. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
Adolescents' Perspectives on Personalized E-Feedback in the Context of Health Risk Behavior Screening for Primary Care: Qualitative Study.青少年对初级保健健康风险行为筛查背景下个性化电子反馈的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 20;19(7):e261. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7474.