• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕期及哺乳期暴露于抗癫痫药物对儿童神经发育的比较安全性:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析

Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs for neurological development in children exposed during pregnancy and breast feeding: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Veroniki Areti Angeliki, Rios Patricia, Cogo Elise, Straus Sharon E, Finkelstein Yaron, Kealey Ryan, Reynen Emily, Soobiah Charlene, Thavorn Kednapa, Hutton Brian, Hemmelgarn Brenda R, Yazdi Fatemeh, D'Souza Jennifer, MacDonald Heather, Tricco Andrea C

机构信息

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 20;7(7):e017248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017248.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017248
PMID:28729328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5642793/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Compare the safety of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on neurodevelopment of infants/children exposed in utero or during breast feeding.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Systematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA). MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until 27 April 2017. Screening, data abstraction and quality appraisal were completed in duplicate by independent reviewers.

PARTICIPANTS

29 cohort studies including 5100 infants/children.

INTERVENTIONS

Monotherapy and polytherapy AEDs including first-generation (carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, ethosuximide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, valproate) and newer-generation (gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, vigabatrin) AEDs. Epileptic women who did not receive AEDs during pregnancy or breast feeding served as the control group.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Cognitive developmental delay and autism/dyspraxia were primary outcomes. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, language delay, neonatal seizures, psychomotor developmental delay and social impairment were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The NMA on cognitive developmental delay (11 cohort studies, 933 children, 18 treatments) suggested that among all AEDs only valproate was statistically significantly associated with more children experiencing cognitive developmental delay compared with control (OR=7.40, 95% credible interval (CrI) 3.00 to 18.46). The NMA on autism (5 cohort studies, 2551 children, 12 treatments) suggested that oxcarbazepine (OR 13.51, CrI 1.28 to 221.40), valproate (OR 17.29, 95% CrI 2.40 to 217.60), lamotrigine (OR 8.88, CrI 1.28 to 112.00) and lamotrigine+valproate (OR 132.70, CrI 7.41 to 3851.00) were associated with significantly greater odds of developing autism compared with control. The NMA on psychomotor developmental delay (11 cohort studies, 1145 children, 18 treatments) found that valproate (OR 4.16, CrI 2.04 to 8.75) and carbamazepine+phenobarbital+valproate (OR 19.12, CrI 1.49 to 337.50) were associated with significantly greater odds of psychomotor delay compared with control.

CONCLUSIONS

Valproate alone or combined with another AED is associated with the greatest odds of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with control. Oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine were associated with increased occurrence of autism. Counselling is advised for women considering pregnancy to tailor the safest regimen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO database (CRD42014008925).

摘要

目的

比较抗癫痫药物(AEDs)对子宫内或母乳喂养期间暴露的婴儿/儿童神经发育的安全性。

设计与研究地点

系统评价和贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析(NMA)。检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库直至2017年4月27日。筛选、数据提取和质量评估由独立评审员重复完成。

参与者

29项队列研究,包括5100名婴儿/儿童。

干预措施

单药治疗和联合治疗的AEDs,包括第一代(卡马西平、氯巴占、氯硝西泮、乙琥胺、苯巴比妥、苯妥英、扑米酮、丙戊酸盐)和新一代(加巴喷丁、拉莫三嗪、左乙拉西坦、奥卡西平、托吡酯、氨己烯酸)AEDs。孕期或母乳喂养期间未接受AEDs的癫痫女性作为对照组。

主要和次要结局指标

认知发育迟缓及自闭症/运动障碍为主要结局。注意力缺陷多动障碍、语言发育迟缓、新生儿惊厥、精神运动发育迟缓及社交障碍为次要结局。

结果

关于认知发育迟缓的NMA(11项队列研究,933名儿童,18种治疗方法)表明,在所有AEDs中,与对照组相比,仅丙戊酸盐在统计学上与更多儿童出现认知发育迟缓显著相关(比值比[OR]=7.40,95%可信区间[CrI]3.00至18.46)。关于自闭症的NMA(5项队列研究,2551名儿童,12种治疗方法)表明,与对照组相比,奥卡西平(OR 13.51,CrI 1.28至221.40)、丙戊酸盐(OR 17.29,95% CrI 2.40至217.60)、拉莫三嗪(OR 8.88,CrI 1.28至112.00)及拉莫三嗪+丙戊酸盐(OR 132.70,CrI 7.41至3851.00)与自闭症发生几率显著增加相关。关于精神运动发育迟缓的NMA(11项队列研究,1145名儿童,18种治疗方法)发现,与对照组相比,丙戊酸盐(OR 4.16,CrI 2.04至8.75)及卡马西平+苯巴比妥+丙戊酸盐(OR 19.12,CrI 1.49至337.50)与精神运动发育迟缓几率显著增加相关。

结论

与对照组相比,单独使用丙戊酸盐或与另一种AED联合使用与不良神经发育结局的几率最高相关。奥卡西平和拉莫三嗪与自闭症发生率增加相关。建议为考虑怀孕的女性提供咨询,以制定最安全的治疗方案。

试验注册号

PROSPERO数据库(CRD42014008925)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4955/5642793/7b52b8f5357b/bmjopen-2017-017248f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4955/5642793/0f5131d4d038/bmjopen-2017-017248f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4955/5642793/f210f76c7d99/bmjopen-2017-017248f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4955/5642793/7b52b8f5357b/bmjopen-2017-017248f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4955/5642793/0f5131d4d038/bmjopen-2017-017248f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4955/5642793/f210f76c7d99/bmjopen-2017-017248f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4955/5642793/7b52b8f5357b/bmjopen-2017-017248f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs for neurological development in children exposed during pregnancy and breast feeding: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.孕期及哺乳期暴露于抗癫痫药物对儿童神经发育的比较安全性:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 20;7(7):e017248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017248.
2
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
3
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.
4
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.
5
Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of congenital malformations and prenatal outcomes.孕期抗癫痫药物的比较安全性:先天性畸形和产前结局的系统评价与网状荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2017 May 5;15(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0845-1.
6
Treatment for epilepsy in pregnancy: neurodevelopmental outcomes in the child.妊娠期癫痫的治疗:儿童的神经发育结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 30;2014(10):CD010236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010236.pub2.
7
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.妊娠期癫痫的单药治疗:子代先天性畸形结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub2.
8
Comparison of antiepileptic drugs, no treatment, or placebo for children with benign epilepsy with centro temporal spikes.抗癫痫药物、不治疗或安慰剂对伴有中央颞区棘波的儿童良性癫痫的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 5;2014(9):CD006779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006779.pub2.
9
Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents.乙琥胺、丙戊酸钠或拉莫三嗪用于儿童及青少年失神发作。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2(2):CD003032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003032.pub3.
10
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Prenatal Exposure to Antiseizure Medications Over the Past Decade: A Nationwide Study.过去十年间产前暴露于抗癫痫药物的趋势:一项全国性研究。
Neurology. 2025 Aug 26;105(4):e213933. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213933. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Management of Bipolar Disorder in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Clinicians' Guide.孕期及产后双相情感障碍的管理:临床医生指南。
CNS Drugs. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01202-7.
3
Differentiation Defect Into GABAergic Neurons in Cerebral Organoids From Autism Patients.自闭症患者大脑类器官中向γ-氨基丁酸能神经元的分化缺陷

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of congenital malformations and prenatal outcomes.孕期抗癫痫药物的比较安全性:先天性畸形和产前结局的系统评价与网状荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2017 May 5;15(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0845-1.
2
Tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: a network meta-analysis.新型抗癫痫药物的耐受性:一项网状荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;73(7):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2245-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Jun;31(6):e70449. doi: 10.1111/cns.70449.
4
Pre-pregnancy fertility guidance for women of childbearing age with epilepsy: A scoping review.癫痫育龄女性孕前生育指导:一项范围综述
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Dec 11;8:100276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100276. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Folate prevents the autism-related phenotype caused by developmental pyrethroid exposure in prairie voles.叶酸可预防发育中的草原田鼠接触拟除虫菊酯所引起的自闭症相关表型。
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 4:2024.11.25.625285. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.25.625285.
6
Reproductive and fetal toxicity studies of histamine H3 receptor antagonist DL76 used in mice to prevent maximal electroshock-induced seizure.组胺H3受体拮抗剂DL76在小鼠中用于预防最大电休克诱发癫痫的生殖和胎儿毒性研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1364353. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1364353. eCollection 2024.
7
Neurobehavioral Outcomes of Children with Antenatal Exposure to Antiseizure Medications.产前接触抗癫痫药物儿童的神经行为结局
Indian J Pediatr. 2025 Mar;92(3):252-259. doi: 10.1007/s12098-024-05165-3. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
8
Efficacy and safety of herbal medicine combined with acupuncture in pediatric epilepsy treatment: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.草药联合针灸治疗小儿癫痫的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0303201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303201. eCollection 2024.
9
Prenatal exposure to antiseizure medications and fetal growth: a population-based cohort study from the Nordic countries.产前暴露于抗癫痫药物与胎儿生长:一项来自北欧国家的基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Feb 8;38:100849. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100849. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a patient with epilepsy: Staring down the challenge of inattention versus nonconvulsive seizures.一名癫痫患者合并注意缺陷多动障碍:正视注意力不集中与非惊厥性癫痫发作的挑战。
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2024 Feb 1;25:100651. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100651. eCollection 2024.
在网状Meta分析中合并随机和非随机证据。
Stat Med. 2017 Apr 15;36(8):1210-1226. doi: 10.1002/sim.7223. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data.一项使用个体患者数据的间接比较方法及应用的范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Apr 27;16:47. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0146-y.
5
Uncertainty in Treatment Rankings: Reanalysis of Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials.治疗排名的不确定性:随机试验网络荟萃分析的再分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 17;164(10):666-73. doi: 10.7326/M15-2521. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
6
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
7
The rank-heat plot is a novel way to present the results from a network meta-analysis including multiple outcomes.秩热图是呈现包含多个结果的网状Meta分析结果的一种新方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities.纳入随机对照试验和非随机对照队列研究以评估医学治疗安全性和有效性的网络荟萃分析:挑战与机遇
Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 5;4:147. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0133-0.
9
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression.网络荟萃分析中的一致性和不一致性:使用多元荟萃回归进行模型估计。
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):111-25. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1045.
10
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.PRISMA 扩展声明用于报告包含健康保健干预措施网络荟萃分析的系统评价:清单和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.