Snow David P
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University.
Lang Sci. 2017 Jan;59:180-191. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
This study investigates infants' transition from nonverbal to verbal communication using evidence from regression patterns. As an example of regressions, prelinguistic infants learning American Sign Language (ASL) use pointing gestures to communicate. At the onset of single signs, however, these gestures disappear. Petitto (1987) attributed the regression to the children's discovery that pointing has two functions, namely, deixis and linguistic pronouns. The 1:2 relation (1 form, 2 functions) violates the simple 1:1 pattern that infants are believed to expect. This kind of conflict, Petitto argued, explains the regression. Based on the additional observation that the regression coincided with the boundary between prelinguistic and linguistic communication, Petitto concluded that the prelinguistic and linguistic periods are autonomous. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the 1:1 model and to determine whether it explains a previously reported regression of intonation in English. Background research showed that gestures and intonation have different forms but the same pragmatic meanings, a 2:1 form-function pattern that plausibly precipitates the regression. The hypothesis of the study was that gestures and intonation are closely related. Moreover, because gestures and intonation change in the opposite direction, the negative correlation between them indicates a robust inverse relationship. To test this prediction, speech samples of 29 infants (8 to 16 months) were analyzed acoustically and compared to parent-report data on several verbal and gestural scales. In support of the hypothesis, gestures alone were inversely correlated with intonation. In addition, the regression model explains nonlinearities stemming from different form-function configurations. However, the results failed to support the claim that regressions linked to early words or signs reflect autonomy. The discussion ends with a focus on the special role of intonation in children's transition from "prelinguistic" communication to language.
本研究利用回归模式的证据,调查婴儿从非语言交流到语言交流的转变。作为回归的一个例子,学习美国手语(ASL)的前语言期婴儿使用指示性手势进行交流。然而,在开始使用单个手语时,这些手势就消失了。佩蒂托(1987)将这种回归归因于儿童发现指示具有两种功能,即指示和语言代词。1:2关系(1种形式,2种功能)违反了婴儿被认为所期望的简单1:1模式。佩蒂托认为,这种冲突解释了回归现象。基于回归与前语言交流和语言交流之间的界限相吻合这一额外观察结果,佩蒂托得出结论,前语言期和语言期是自主的。本研究的目的是评估1:1模型,并确定它是否能解释先前报道的英语语调回归现象。背景研究表明,手势和语调具有不同的形式,但具有相同的语用意义,这种2:1的形式-功能模式可能导致了回归。该研究的假设是手势和语调密切相关。此外,由于手势和语调朝着相反的方向变化,它们之间的负相关表明存在一种强烈的反向关系。为了验证这一预测,对29名婴儿(8至16个月)的语音样本进行了声学分析,并与家长在几个语言和手势量表上的报告数据进行了比较。为支持该假设提供了证据,单独的手势与语调呈负相关。此外,回归模型解释了源于不同形式-功能配置的非线性现象。然而,结果未能支持与早期单词或手语相关的回归反映自主性这一说法。讨论最后聚焦于语调在儿童从“前语言”交流向语言过渡中的特殊作用。