• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聋儿的手势交流:父母输入对早期语言发展的影响及非影响因素

Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development.

作者信息

Goldin-Meadow S, Mylander C

出版信息

Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1984;49(3-4):1-151.

PMID:6537463
Abstract

We previously reported that deaf children of hearing parents can develop a gestural communication system with some of the observed properties of early child language. In the present study, this phenomenon of gesture creation was replicated in four deaf children aged 1-4 to 3-1 at the time of the first interview. Each child, despite his atypical language-learning conditions (in particular his lack of usable conventional linguistic input, either oral or manual), developed a gesture system comparable in semantic content and structure (specifically, constructional ordering of elements, differential probabilities of production of elements, and recursive concatenation of semantic relations) to the gestural systems of the six deaf children of hearing parents in our original study and comparable as well to the spoken and sign systems of children acquiring conventional languages under typical learning conditions. This phenomenon suggests that the human child has strong biases to communicate in language-like ways. Nevertheless, it is possible that the deaf child's hearing parents, and not the child himself, were responsible for the emergence of the child's structured (yet idiosyncratic) gesture system. To investigate this possibility, we considered three possible parental influences on the child's sentence structures. First, we entertained the hypothesis that the children's sign sentences were merely imitations (perhaps even uncomprehending imitations) of a hearing adult's immediately preceding gestures. Second, we considered the possibility that the regularities underlying the deaf children's structured sign sentences were induced from their hearing parents' gestures taken in toto. Finally, we considered the possibility that the deaf children's sign sentences had been shaped by their parents' responses to those sentences. We found no evidence to support any of these hypotheses. The data reported in this series of studies confirm that deaf children lacking a conventional linguistic input can develop a gestural communication system that shows some of the structural regularities characteristic of early child language. The results suggest that communication with a number of language-like properties can develop in a markedly atypical language-learning environment, even without a tutor's modeling or shaping the structural aspects of the communication. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that the deaf child himself plays a seminal role in the emergence of the structural aspects of these communication systems.

摘要

我们之前报道过,听力正常的父母所生的聋儿能够发展出一种具有幼儿早期语言某些观察到的特性的手势交流系统。在本研究中,这种手势创造现象在首次访谈时年龄为1岁4个月至3岁1个月的4名聋儿身上得到了重现。每个孩子,尽管其语言学习条件不典型(特别是缺乏可用的传统语言输入,无论是口语还是手语),但都发展出了一个在语义内容和结构上(具体来说,元素的构建顺序、元素产生的不同概率以及语义关系的递归连接)与我们原研究中6名听力正常的父母所生的聋儿的手势系统相当,并且也与在典型学习条件下习得传统语言的儿童的口语和手语系统相当的手势系统。这一现象表明人类儿童具有以类似语言的方式进行交流的强烈倾向。然而,聋儿的听力正常的父母而非孩子自身,有可能是孩子结构化(但独特)的手势系统出现的原因。为了探究这种可能性,我们考虑了父母对孩子句子结构的三种可能影响。首先,我们提出这样的假设,即孩子的手语句子仅仅是对听力正常的成年人紧接之前的手势的模仿(甚至可能是不理解的模仿)。其次,我们考虑了聋儿结构化手语句子背后的规律是从他们听力正常的父母的全部手势中归纳出来的可能性。最后,我们考虑了聋儿的手语句子是由他们父母对这些句子的反应塑造而成的可能性。我们没有发现支持这些假设中任何一个的证据。这一系列研究中报告的数据证实,缺乏传统语言输入的聋儿能够发展出一种显示出幼儿早期语言某些结构规律特征的手势交流系统。结果表明,即使没有教师对手势交流的结构方面进行示范或塑造,在明显非典型的语言学习环境中也能发展出具有许多类似语言特性的交流方式。这些数据与聋儿自身在这些交流系统结构方面的出现中起关键作用这一假设是一致的。

相似文献

1
Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development.聋儿的手势交流:父母输入对早期语言发展的影响及非影响因素
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1984;49(3-4):1-151.
2
Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures.两种文化中失聪儿童创造的自发符号系统。
Nature. 1998 Jan 15;391(6664):279-81. doi: 10.1038/34646.
3
First stage of language acquisition through two modalities in deaf and hearing children.聋童和听力正常儿童通过两种方式进行语言习得的第一阶段。
Ital J Neurol Sci. 1986 Apr;Suppl 5:109-15.
4
The development of analogical reasoning in deaf children and their parents' communication mode.聋儿类比推理能力的发展及其父母的沟通方式。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004 Spring;9(2):153-75. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enh018.
5
The role of parental input in the development of a morphological system.父母投入在形态系统发育中的作用。
J Child Lang. 1990 Oct;17(3):527-63. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900010874.
6
Expressing generic concepts with and without a language model.使用和不使用语言模型来表达通用概念。
Cognition. 2005 Jun;96(2):109-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.003. Epub 2004 Dec 19.
7
Speech and language development in a parent-infant total communication program.亲子全沟通项目中的言语和语言发展
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1982 Sep-Oct;97:62-72.
8
[Teaching sign language to the families of the deaf: focusing the learning process].[向聋人家庭教授手语:聚焦学习过程]
Pro Fono. 2005 Jan-Apr;17(1):89-98.
9
Early dissociation of verbal and nonverbal gestural ability in an epileptic deaf child.一名癫痫失聪儿童中言语与非言语手势能力的早期分离
Ann Neurol. 1999 Dec;46(6):929-32.
10
Gestural communication in deaf children: noneffect of parental input on language development.聋儿的手势交流:父母输入对语言发展无影响。
Science. 1983 Jul 22;221(4608):372-4. doi: 10.1126/science.6867713.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Phenotypical Heterogeneity and its Underlying Factors in Gesture Skills of Chinese Autistic Children: Clustering Analysis.探究中国自闭症儿童手势技能的表型异质性及其潜在因素:聚类分析。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Sep;54(9):3504-3515. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-06049-9. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
2
Emergent Morphology in Child Homesign: Evidence from Number Language.儿童自创手语中的新兴形态:来自数字语言的证据
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(1):16-40. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1922281. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
Is It a Noun or Is It a Verb? Resolving the Ambicategoricality Problem.
它是名词还是动词?解决兼类词问题。
Lang Learn Dev. 2012;8(2):87-112. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2011.580236. Epub 2012 May 30.
4
Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication.现代人类交流中的模仿化石。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 May 10;376(1824):20200204. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0204. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Structural biases that children bring to language learning: A cross-cultural look at gestural input to homesign.儿童在语言学习中所具有的结构偏向:对家庭手语手势输入的跨文化研究。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104608. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104608. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Gestures in Storytelling by Preschool Chinese-Speaking Children With and Without Autism.有自闭症和无自闭症的学龄前汉语儿童在讲故事中的手势
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 8;11:573212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573212. eCollection 2020.
7
The origins of higher-order thinking lie in children's spontaneous talk across the pre-school years.高阶思维的起源在于儿童在学前阶段自发的对话。
Cognition. 2020 Jul;200:104274. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104274. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Does intention matter? Relations between parent pointing, infant pointing, and developing language ability.意图重要吗?父母的指示、婴儿的指示与语言能力发展之间的关系。
J Cogn Dev. 2019;20(5):635-655. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2019.1648266. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
9
Becoming human: human infants link language and cognition, but what about the other great apes?成为人类:人类婴儿将语言和认知联系起来,但其他大型类人猿呢?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 6;375(1789):20180408. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0408. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?主题角色:核心知识还是语言结构?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1850-1869. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01634-5.