Suppr超能文献

经腹疝修补术治疗伴或不伴合成网片的嵌顿性和绞窄性腹外疝的疗效。

Outcomes following repair of incarcerated and strangulated ventral hernias with or without synthetic mesh.

机构信息

General surgery department, faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura city, Egypt.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Jul 18;12:31. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0143-4. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of synthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair under contaminated conditions is a controversial issue due to the considerable risk of surgical site infection (SSI). This study aimed to review the outcomes of repair of incarcerated and strangulated ventral hernias with or without synthetic mesh in compliance with established clinical guidelines regarding the incidence of SSI and hernia recurrence.

METHODS

The records of patients with complicated ventral hernias who were treated with or without synthetic mesh repair were reviewed. Variables collected included the characteristics of patients and of ventral hernias, type of repair, and incidence of SSI and recurrence.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients (56 males) of a mean age of 56 years were included. Fifty-two (42.6%) and 70 (57.4%) patients presented with incarcerated and strangulated ventral hernias, respectively. Sixty-six (54%) patients were treated with on-lay mesh repair, and 56 (46%) were managed with suture repair. Twenty-one patients required bowel resection. SSI was detected in eight (6.5%) patients. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the incidence of SSI (7.5% for mesh group vs 5.3% for suture group). Recurrence occurred in seven patients. Median follow-up period was 24 months. The suture repair group had a significantly higher incidence of recurrence than the mesh group. Diabetes mellitus, previous recurrence, and intestinal resection were significant predictors for SSI.

CONCLUSION

Following established guidelines, synthetic mesh repair of incarcerated and strangulated ventral hernias attained lower recurrence rate, comparable incidence of SSI, and higher rate of seroma formation than suture repair.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Research Registry, researchregistry1891.

摘要

背景

由于手术部位感染(SSI)的风险相当大,因此在污染条件下使用合成网片修复腹疝是一个有争议的问题。本研究旨在根据有关 SSI 和疝复发发生率的既定临床指南,回顾使用或不使用合成网片修复嵌顿性和绞窄性腹疝的结果。

方法

回顾了接受或不接受合成网片修复的复杂腹疝患者的记录。收集的变量包括患者和腹疝的特征、修复类型以及 SSI 和复发的发生率。

结果

共纳入 122 例(56 例男性)平均年龄 56 岁的患者。52 例(42.6%)和 70 例(57.4%)分别为嵌顿性和绞窄性腹疝。66 例(54%)患者接受了覆盖式网片修复,56 例(46%)患者接受了缝合修复。21 例患者需要肠切除术。8 例(6.5%)患者检测到 SSI。两组 SSI 发生率无显著差异(网片组为 7.5%,缝合组为 5.3%)。7 例患者复发。中位随访时间为 24 个月。缝合修复组的复发率明显高于网片修复组。糖尿病、既往复发和肠切除术是 SSI 的显著预测因素。

结论

根据既定指南,使用合成网片修复嵌顿性和绞窄性腹疝的复发率较低,SSI 的发生率相当,血清肿的发生率高于缝合修复。

试验注册

Research Registry,researchregistry1891。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e498/5516310/36aaf6026153/13017_2017_143_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验