• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从“公平”项目中学习:一个关于非洲弱势群体的多国研究项目的内容、背景、过程及影响

Learning from doing the EquitAble project: Content, context, process, and impact of a multi-country research project on vulnerable populations in Africa.

作者信息

MacLachlan Mac, Amin Mutamad, Mji Gubela, Mannan Hasheem, McVeigh Joanne, McAuliffe Eilish, Amadhila Elina, Munthali Alister, Eide Arne H, Dube A Kudakwashe

机构信息

Centre for Global Health and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

出版信息

Afr J Disabil. 2014 Oct 6;3(2):89. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v3i2.89. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.4102/ajod.v3i2.89
PMID:28730013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5442513/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'EquitAble' project carried out content analyses of policies and collected and analysed qualitative and quantitative data concerning access to health services in Sudan, Malawi, Namibia and South Africa. Our particular concern was to address the situation of people with disabilities, although not in isolation from other marginalised or vulnerable groups.

OBJECTIVES

This article reports on the content, context, process and impact of project EquitAble, funded by the European Commission Seventh Research Framework Programme, which brought together researchers from Ireland, Norway, South Africa, Namibia, Sudan and Malawi.

METHOD

After the 4-year project ended in February 2013, all members of the consortium were asked to anonymously complete a bespoke questionnaire designed by the coordinating team. The purpose of the questionnaire was to capture the views of those who collaborated on the research project in relation to issues of content, context, process and impact of the EquitAble project.

RESULTS

Our results indicated some of the successes and challenges encountered by our consortium.

CONCLUSION

We identified contextual and process learning points, factors often not discussed in papers, which typically focus on the reporting of the 'content' of results.

摘要

背景

“公平可及”项目对政策进行了内容分析,并收集和分析了有关苏丹、马拉维、纳米比亚和南非卫生服务可及性的定性和定量数据。我们特别关注的是残疾人的状况,不过并非将其与其他边缘化或弱势群体孤立开来。

目的

本文报告了由欧盟委员会第七研究框架计划资助的“公平可及”项目的内容、背景、过程和影响,该项目汇聚了来自爱尔兰、挪威、南非、纳米比亚、苏丹和马拉维的研究人员。

方法

在该为期4年的项目于2013年2月结束后,要求联合体的所有成员匿名填写由协调团队设计的定制问卷。问卷的目的是收集参与该研究项目的人员对“公平可及”项目的内容、背景、过程和影响等问题的看法。

结果

我们的结果表明了联合体所取得的一些成功以及遇到的挑战。

结论

我们确定了背景和过程方面的经验教训,这些因素在论文中通常未被讨论,而论文通常侧重于结果“内容”的报告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/1c0606856a2c/AJOD-3-89-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/66d143c15635/AJOD-3-89-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/912751c426ad/AJOD-3-89-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/f08a8513cb0d/AJOD-3-89-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/f80f90a671a8/AJOD-3-89-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/18dd1a5e249d/AJOD-3-89-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/9a63fbe21d26/AJOD-3-89-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/43d5f2e6685e/AJOD-3-89-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/1c0606856a2c/AJOD-3-89-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/66d143c15635/AJOD-3-89-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/912751c426ad/AJOD-3-89-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/f08a8513cb0d/AJOD-3-89-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/f80f90a671a8/AJOD-3-89-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/18dd1a5e249d/AJOD-3-89-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/9a63fbe21d26/AJOD-3-89-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/43d5f2e6685e/AJOD-3-89-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adf/5442513/1c0606856a2c/AJOD-3-89-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning from doing the EquitAble project: Content, context, process, and impact of a multi-country research project on vulnerable populations in Africa.从“公平”项目中学习:一个关于非洲弱势群体的多国研究项目的内容、背景、过程及影响
Afr J Disabil. 2014 Oct 6;3(2):89. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v3i2.89. eCollection 2014.
2
Inclusion and human rights in health policies: comparative and benchmarking analysis of 51 policies from Malawi, Sudan, South Africa and Namibia.卫生政策中的包容和人权:来自马拉维、苏丹、南非和纳米比亚的 51 项政策的比较和基准分析。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035864. Epub 2012 May 23.
3
From local to global: a qualitative review of the multi-leveled impact of a multi-country health research capacity development partnership on maternal health in Sudan.从地方到全球:对多国卫生研究能力发展伙伴关系对苏丹孕产妇健康的多层次影响的定性综述
Global Health. 2016 May 16;12(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0153-0.
4
Combining survey data, GIS and qualitative interviews in the analysis of health service access for persons with disabilities.在分析残疾人获得卫生服务的情况时结合调查数据、地理信息系统和定性访谈。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0166-2.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Developing resources to facilitate culturally-sensitive service planning and delivery - doing research inclusively with people with learning disabilities.开发资源以促进具有文化敏感性的服务规划与提供——与学习障碍者一起开展包容性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 May 18;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0031-1. eCollection 2016.
7
Core concepts of human rights and inclusion of vulnerable groups in the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudan.马拉维、纳米比亚和苏丹的精神卫生政策中的人权核心概念和弱势群体包容。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2013 Feb 13;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-7-7.
8
Exploring the interaction of activity limitations with context, systems, community and personal factors in accessing public health care services: A presentation of South African case studies.探索活动受限与获得公共卫生保健服务时的环境、系统、社区及个人因素之间的相互作用:南非案例研究展示
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017 Feb 8;9(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1166.
9
"This one will delay us": barriers to accessing health care services among persons with disabilities in Malawi.“这会耽误我们的时间”:马拉维残疾人获取医疗服务的障碍。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(6):683-690. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1404148. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Disability research in African Network for Evidence-to-Action in Disability affiliated countries.非洲残疾问题循证行动网络相关国家的残疾研究。
Afr J Disabil. 2024 Nov 8;13:1517. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1517. eCollection 2024.
2
The Rehabilitation Landscape in a Low-to-Middle-Income Country: Stakeholder Perspectives and Policy Implications-A Qualitative Study.中低收入国家的康复景观:利益相关者的观点和政策意义——一项定性研究。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241271973. doi: 10.1177/00469580241271973.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the local context for the application of global mental health: a rural South African experience.了解全球精神卫生应用的当地背景:南非农村地区的经验
Int Health. 2013 Mar;5(1):38-42. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihs016.
2
EquiFrame: a framework for analysis of the inclusion of human rights and vulnerable groups in health policies.EquiFrame:一个分析健康政策中纳入人权和弱势群体的框架。
Health Hum Rights. 2011;13(2):1-20.
3
Inclusion and human rights in health policies: comparative and benchmarking analysis of 51 policies from Malawi, Sudan, South Africa and Namibia.
卫生政策中的包容和人权:来自马拉维、苏丹、南非和纳米比亚的 51 项政策的比较和基准分析。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035864. Epub 2012 May 23.