Şorop-Florea Maria, Ciurea Raluca Niculina, Ioana Mihai, Stepan Alex Emilian, Stoica George Alin, Tănase Florentina, Comănescu Maria Cristina, Novac Marius Bogdan, Drăgan Ioana, Pătru Ciprian LaurenŢiu, Drăguşin Roxana Cristina, Zorilă George Lucian, Cărbunaru Ovidiu Marian, Oprescu NuŢi Daniela, Ceauşu Iuliana, Vlădăreanu Simona, Tudorache Ştefania, Iliescu Dominic Gabriel
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania;
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017;58(2):323-337.
Perinatal autopsy remains the gold-standard procedure used to establish the fetal, neonatal or infant abnormalities. Progressively, perinatal pathology has become a specialized field with important roles of audit for fetal prenatal diagnostic tools, in parents counseling regarding future pregnancies, in scientific research, for epidemiology of congenital abnormalities and teaching. The differences between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy reports represent a strong argument for the autopsy examination following termination of pregnancy. The reasons for such discrepancies are related to the ultrasonographic or pathological examination conditions, the type of the anomalies, the expertise and availability of the operators. Several facts led to an undesirable increase of refusals from parents to consent to a conventional invasive autopsy: the centralization of pathology services, the poor counseling provided by non-experts in fetal medicine and the clinicians' over-appreciation of the importance of the ultrasound diagnostic investigation. Although non-invasive alternatives have been tested with promising results, conventional autopsy remains the gold standard technique for the prenatal diagnosis audit. We report and analyze several cases of prenatally diagnosed malformed fetuses with different particularities that underline the necessity of perinatal autopsy. We discuss the antenatal findings and management and post-mortem autopsies in the respective pregnancies.
围产期尸检仍然是用于确定胎儿、新生儿或婴儿异常情况的金标准程序。围产期病理学逐渐成为一个专业领域,在对胎儿产前诊断工具进行审核、为父母提供关于未来妊娠的咨询、科学研究、先天性异常的流行病学研究以及教学等方面发挥着重要作用。产前超声报告与尸检报告之间的差异有力地证明了终止妊娠后进行尸检的必要性。出现这种差异的原因与超声检查或病理检查条件、异常类型、操作人员的专业水平和可获得性有关。有几个因素导致父母拒绝同意进行传统侵入性尸检的情况出现了不良增长:病理服务的集中化、胎儿医学非专家提供的咨询不足以及临床医生对超声诊断检查重要性的过度高估。尽管已经对非侵入性替代方法进行了测试并取得了有希望的结果,但传统尸检仍然是产前诊断审核的金标准技术。我们报告并分析了几例产前诊断为畸形胎儿的病例,这些病例具有不同的特点,强调了围产期尸检的必要性。我们讨论了各自妊娠中的产前检查结果、处理情况以及死后尸检情况。