Suppr超能文献

不适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器电击——发生率、影响及对驾驶执照的意义

Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks-incidence, effect, and implications for driver licensing.

作者信息

Watanabe Eiichi, Okajima Katsunori, Shimane Akira, Ozawa Tomoya, Manaka Tetsuyuki, Morishima Itsuro, Asai Toru, Takagi Masahiko, Honda Toshihiro, Kasai Atsunobu, Fujii Eitaro, Yamashiro Kohei, Kohno Ritsuko, Abe Haruhiko, Noda Takashi, Kurita Takashi, Watanabe Shigeyuki, Ohmori Hiroya, Nitta Takashi, Aizawa Yoshifusa, Kiyono Ken, Okumura Ken

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Dengakugakubo 1-98, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Himeji Cardiovascular Center, Himeji, Japan.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;49(3):271-280. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0272-4. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have an ongoing risk of sudden incapacitation that may cause traffic accidents. However, there are limited data on the magnitude of this risk after inappropriate ICD therapies. We studied the rate of syncope associated with inappropriate ICD therapies to provide a scientific basis for formulating driving restrictions.

METHODS

Inappropriate ICD therapy event data between 1997 and 2014 from 50 Japanese institutions were analyzed retrospectively. The annual risk of harm (RH) to others posed by a driver with an ICD was calculated for private driving habits. We used a commonly employed annual RH to others of 5 in 100,000 (0.005%) as an acceptable risk threshold.

RESULTS

Of the 4089 patients, 772 inappropriate ICD therapies occurred in 417 patients (age 61 ± 15 years, 74% male, and 65% secondary prevention). Patients experiencing inappropriate therapies had a mean number of 1.8 ± 1.5 therapy episodes during a median follow-up period of 3.9 years. No significant differences were found in the age, sex, or number of inappropriate therapies between patients receiving ICDs for primary or secondary prevention. Only three patients (0.7%) experienced syncope associated with inappropriate therapies. The maximum annual RH to others after the first therapy in primary and secondary prevention patients was calculated to be 0.11 in 100,000 and 0.12 in 100,000, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the annual RH from driving was far below the commonly cited acceptable risk threshold. Our data provide useful information to supplement current recommendations on driving restrictions in ICD patients with private driving habits.

摘要

目的

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者存在突发失能的持续风险,这可能导致交通事故。然而,关于不适当ICD治疗后这种风险的程度,数据有限。我们研究了与不适当ICD治疗相关的晕厥发生率,为制定驾驶限制提供科学依据。

方法

回顾性分析了1997年至2014年来自50家日本机构的不适当ICD治疗事件数据。针对私家车驾驶习惯,计算了ICD患者对他人造成伤害的年度风险(RH)。我们将常用的对他人的年度RH为十万分之五(0.005%)作为可接受的风险阈值。

结果

在4089例患者中,417例患者(年龄61±15岁,74%为男性,65%为二级预防)发生了772次不适当ICD治疗。在中位随访期3.9年期间,经历不适当治疗的患者平均治疗发作次数为1.8±1.5次。接受ICD一级或二级预防的患者在年龄、性别或不适当治疗次数方面未发现显著差异。只有3例患者(0.7%)经历了与不适当治疗相关的晕厥。一级和二级预防患者首次治疗后对他人的最大年度RH分别计算为十万分之0.11和十万分之0.12。

结论

我们发现驾驶的年度RH远低于普遍引用的可接受风险阈值。我们的数据为补充当前关于有私家车驾驶习惯的ICD患者驾驶限制的建议提供了有用信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b37/5543197/486b420cd8b5/10840_2017_272_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验