Suppr超能文献

《海德堡情绪调节策略量表(HFERST)的编制与验证:量表结构、信度与效度》

Development and Validation of the Heidelberg Form for Emotion Regulation Strategies (HFERST): Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity.

机构信息

1 University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):880-906. doi: 10.1177/1073191117720283. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

Abstract

The Heidelberg Form for Emotion Regulation Strategies (HFERST) was developed to complement previous emotion regulation (ER) questionnaires and addresses some of their limitations by measuring eight ER strategies. An initial item pool was developed in German following expert discussions and adaptation of the items from existing ER scales. Following a stepwise selection based on the experts' judgments, 32 items with the best content validity were chosen. Results of an exploratory factor analysis in Study 1 ( = 399) and two confirmatory factor analyses in Studies 2 ( = 715) and 3 ( = 408) supported the eight-factor structure of the HFERST and provided evidence for its internal consistency, construct and criterion validity, and clinical utility. Study 4 supported a 2-week stability of the HFERST and Study 5 showed that, following an ER intervention, the HFERST captured a reduction in dysfunctional and an improvement in functional ER strategies, which again supports the clinical utility of the HFERST.

摘要

海德堡情绪调节策略量表(HFERST)是为了补充之前的情绪调节(ER)问卷而开发的,通过测量八种 ER 策略来解决其中的一些局限性。最初的项目库是在专家讨论后以德语开发的,并从现有的 ER 量表中改编了项目。根据专家的判断进行逐步选择后,选择了具有最佳内容效度的 32 个项目。研究 1(n = 399)中的探索性因素分析、研究 2(n = 715)和研究 3(n = 408)中的两项验证性因素分析结果支持了 HFERST 的八因素结构,并提供了其内部一致性、构念和效标效度以及临床实用性的证据。研究 4 支持 HFERST 的 2 周稳定性,研究 5 表明,在 ER 干预后,HFERST 可以捕捉到功能失调的减少和功能的改善,这再次支持了 HFERST 的临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验