Trounson Justin S, Pfeifer Jeffrey E
1 Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.
J Correct Health Care. 2017 Oct;23(4):437-448. doi: 10.1177/1078345817720923. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
This study explored correctional officers' response tendencies (i.e., cognitive, interpersonal, and behavioral response patterns they engage in) when managing workplace adversity. In total, 53 Australian correctional officers participated in the study. Eight exploratory focus group discussions ( n = 42) were conducted to identify a set of officer-endorsed response tendencies. Thematic analysis of group data revealed that correctional officers engage in a range of response tendencies when facing workplace adversity and that these tendencies may be categorized as interpersonally, cognitively, or behaviorally based. Semistructured interviews ( n = 11) were then conducted to provide further depth of information regarding officer response tendency usage. Results are discussed in terms of common themes, future research, and implications for developing training programs designed to ameliorate the effects of workplace adversity.
本研究探讨了惩教人员在应对工作场所逆境时的反应倾向(即他们所采用的认知、人际和行为反应模式)。共有53名澳大利亚惩教人员参与了该研究。进行了八次探索性焦点小组讨论(n = 42),以确定一组得到官员认可的反应倾向。对小组数据的主题分析表明,惩教人员在面对工作场所逆境时会采用一系列反应倾向,这些倾向可分为基于人际、认知或行为的类别。随后进行了半结构化访谈(n = 11),以提供有关官员反应倾向使用情况的更深入信息。将根据共同主题、未来研究以及对制定旨在减轻工作场所逆境影响的培训计划的启示来讨论结果。