Haseena K, George Sandhya, Riyaz Najeeba, Sasidharanpillai Sarita, Puthussery Paul V
Assistant Surgeon and Dermatologist, Community Health Centre, Mukkam, India.
Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College, Thrissur, India.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017 Sep-Oct;83(5):569-573. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_185_16.
Palmoplantar psoriasis is often disabling and refractory to conventional therapy. Systemic drugs are indicated in its severe form, but side effects are a concern with their use. Methotrexate is one such systemic drug which is effective and cheap. To reduce systemic toxicity, methotrexate has been tried topically but results have been inconsistent due to poor drug penetration into the skin by passive diffusion. Iontophoresis may enhance its absorption and efficacy.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical methotrexate iontophoresis in comparison with coal tar ointment in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis.
Thirty-one patients with palmar and/or plantar psoriasis were selected for the study and 28 patients completed it. The side having more severe involvement was treated while the other palm/sole served as a control. Iontophoresis using methotrexate solution was carried out on the study palm/sole with the injectable preparation of methotrexate (50 mg/2 ml) once a week for the first 4 weeks and subsequently every two weeks, for a total of six sittings. The control palm/sole was treated with coal tar ointment on other days. Erythema, scaling, induration and fissuring scores were noted in both groups before and after treatment.
Both study and control groups showed decreases in scores but the reduction was more in the study group, the difference being statistically significant.
Drawbacks of our study include the small sample size and the lack of follow-up. The study and control arms were not exactly matched and the study was not blinded.
Methotrexate iontophoresis was safe and more effective than coal tar ointmentin palmoplantarpsoriasis.
掌跖银屑病通常会导致功能障碍,且对传统治疗方法具有耐药性。严重型掌跖银屑病需使用全身性药物进行治疗,但这类药物存在副作用问题。甲氨蝶呤就是一种有效的廉价全身性药物。为降低全身毒性,曾尝试采用甲氨蝶呤局部给药,但由于药物通过被动扩散进入皮肤的效果不佳,导致结果并不一致。离子电渗疗法可能会增强其吸收和疗效。
评估局部应用甲氨蝶呤离子电渗疗法与煤焦油软膏治疗掌跖银屑病的疗效和安全性。
选取31例掌部和/或跖部银屑病患者参与本研究,28例患者完成了研究。对病情较重的一侧进行治疗,另一侧手掌/脚掌作为对照。研究侧手掌/脚掌使用甲氨蝶呤溶液进行离子电渗疗法,采用注射用甲氨蝶呤制剂(50 mg/2 ml),前4周每周1次,之后每两周1次,共进行6次治疗。对照侧手掌/脚掌在其他日期使用煤焦油软膏治疗。记录两组治疗前后的红斑、鳞屑、硬结和皲裂评分。
研究组和对照组的评分均有所下降,但研究组下降更为明显,差异具有统计学意义。
本研究的缺点包括样本量小和缺乏随访。研究组和对照组不完全匹配,且研究未设盲。
在掌跖银屑病的治疗中,甲氨蝶呤离子电渗疗法比煤焦油软膏更安全有效。