Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Heart Rhythm Section, Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Rochester, MN, United States; Optum Labs, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15;245:174-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.043. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
Oral anticoagulation is recommended as a lifelong therapy for most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on long-term outcomes in clinical practice on these drugs are scarce, particularly for the recently approved agents. We aimed to describe differences in characteristics between patients in everyday practice and those enrolled in the pivotal trials, and to report long-term outcomes on oral anticoagulation in practice.
We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using a large U.S. administrative database to identify patients with AF initiating oral anticoagulation and examine incident stroke (effectiveness endpoint, including ischemic stroke and systemic embolism) and major bleeding (safety endpoint).
We identified 107,373 patients with AF initiating anticoagulants 7/1/2006-6/30/2016. These patients were more likely to be elderly, female, or to have advanced kidney disease in comparison to those enrolled in the trials. The event rates for major bleeding (3.1%, 2.8%, 4.0% and 4.9%/year for in apixaban-, dabigatran-, rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients, respectively) were higher than those observed in trials. The event rates for stroke 0.9%, 1.0%, 0.9% and 1.4%/year the four drug cohorts), were similar to the trials. The three-year risk of stroke was 2.3%, 2.1%, 2.3% and 3.5%, and the three year risk of major bleeding was 5.4%, 7.0%, 8.2%, and 11.7% in the four drug cohorts.
Clinical trials represent a narrow spectrum of the general AF population. The trials may underestimate the bleeding risk observed in practice. This study provides important data to help clinicians communicate expected outcomes to patient during shared decision-making.
大多数心房颤动(AF)患者需要终生接受口服抗凝治疗。然而,有关这些药物在临床实践中的长期结果的数据很少,特别是对于最近批准的药物。我们旨在描述日常实践中患者与关键试验中患者之间的特征差异,并报告实践中口服抗凝的长期结果。
我们使用大型美国行政数据库进行回顾性队列分析,以确定开始口服抗凝治疗的 AF 患者,并检查新发中风(有效性终点,包括缺血性中风和全身性栓塞)和大出血(安全性终点)。
我们确定了 107373 名于 2006 年 7 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 30 日开始使用抗凝剂的 AF 患者。与试验中患者相比,这些患者年龄较大、女性或患有晚期肾脏疾病。大出血事件发生率(依普利沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班和华法林治疗患者分别为 3.1%、2.8%、4.0%和 4.9%/年)高于试验观察结果。中风发生率(四个药物队列分别为 0.9%、1.0%、0.9%和 1.4%/年)与试验相似。四个药物队列的中风风险 3 年为 2.3%、2.1%、2.3%和 3.5%,大出血风险 3 年为 5.4%、7.0%、8.2%和 11.7%。
临床试验代表了一般 AF 人群的一个狭窄范围。试验可能低估了实际中观察到的出血风险。本研究提供了重要数据,以帮助临床医生在共同决策时向患者传达预期结果。