University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, Department of Cardiology, Angiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, Department of Cardiology, Angiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;246:87-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.064. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
Experimental data reported a temporal pattern of myocardial edema following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the time course of myocardial edema in a large population of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Myocardium at risk (MAR), infarct size (IS) and myocardial salvage index (MSI) were compared according to the time between infarction and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in a large multicenter STEMI cohort (n=795). CMR scans performed >8days (>192h) after AMI were excluded (n=23). Scans performed within 8days were reported at time-points 12-24h, 24-36h, 36-48h, and days 3 to 8 (192h).
MAR/MSI and IS could be assessed in 693 and 755 patients, respectively. The extent of MAR over the first week after ischemia/reperfusion showed a slight rise and fall (p=0.029 in one-way analysis of variance). However, analysis of IS demonstrated a similar trend over time (p=0.026). Post-hoc testing did not reveal significant differences between particular time periods for both MAR and IS. A stable edematous reaction was also observed between 12-24h, 24-36h, 36-48h and up to 8days after infarction in a more detailed analysis. MSI did not show statistically significant variations (p=0.147). Multivariate regression analysis did not identify the time of CMR acquisition as a predictor of MAR (p=0.709), IS (p=0.810) or MSI (p=0.916).
These data do not confirm a temporal pattern of myocardial edema over the first week after AMI in humans.
已有实验数据报道急性心肌梗死(AMI)后存在心肌水肿的时间模式。因此,本研究旨在评估大面积 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者群体中心肌水肿的时间进程。
在一个大型多中心 STEMI 队列(n=795)中,根据梗死后与心血管磁共振(CMR)成像之间的时间,比较心肌危险区(MAR)、梗死面积(IS)和心肌挽救指数(MSI)。排除 AMI 后>8 天(>192 小时)进行的 CMR 扫描(n=23)。在 8 天内进行的扫描报告在 12-24 小时、24-36 小时、36-48 小时和第 3 至 8 天(192 小时)的时间点。
MAR/MSI 和 IS 可分别在 693 名和 755 名患者中进行评估。缺血/再灌注后第一周内 MAR 的程度显示出轻微的上升和下降(单向方差分析中 p=0.029)。然而,IS 的分析显示随时间呈相似趋势(p=0.026)。事后检验并未显示 MAR 和 IS 在特定时间段之间存在显著差异。在更详细的分析中,在梗死后 12-24 小时、24-36 小时、36-48 小时和 8 天内也观察到稳定的水肿反应。MSI 未显示出统计学上的显著变化(p=0.147)。多变量回归分析并未将 CMR 采集时间确定为 MAR(p=0.709)、IS(p=0.810)或 MSI(p=0.916)的预测因子。
这些数据在人类中并不证实 AMI 后第一周内存在心肌水肿的时间模式。