Sekercioglu Nigar, Curtis Bryan, Murphy Sean, Blackhouse Gord, Barrett Brendan
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Nov;49(11):2043-2049. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1664-1. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Coverage decisions in publicly funded healthcare systems require a formal, systematic and transparent assessment process for policies related to distribution of resources. The process is complex and employs multiple types of information, such as clinical effectiveness, costs and health utility scores which are used to produce quality-adjusted life years. The purpose of this study was to create health utility scores for CKD patients within the Canadian population.
This is a cross-sectional study of CKD patients. We administered the Short-Form 36 Quality of Life Questions to all participants and employed the Short-Form 6 Dimension index to create health utility scores which were created using a set of parametric preference weights, nonparametric preference weights and ordinal health state valuation techniques obtained from a sample of the general population.
Utility values in the dialysis group were lower than in the non-dialysis group. There was a significant relationship between age and health utility scores: As age increases, health utility scores decrease. Diabetes was associated with lower health utility scores in dialysis patients, whereas other covariates did not reach levels of statistical significance in our stepwise regression models. The parametric Bayesian model and standard gamble approach yielded the same results, while the correlation between the nonparametric and parametric methods was above 0.9.
Health utility scores were low relative to the general population norm in our study cohort. Longitudinal assessment of CKD patients to capture possible fluctuations in health utility scores may add useful information.
公共资助医疗系统中的覆盖范围决策需要对与资源分配相关的政策进行正式、系统且透明的评估过程。该过程复杂,需运用多种类型的信息,如临床疗效、成本以及用于生成质量调整生命年的健康效用评分。本研究的目的是为加拿大人群中的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者创建健康效用评分。
这是一项针对CKD患者的横断面研究。我们向所有参与者发放了36项简明健康调查问卷,并采用6维度简明指数,利用从一般人群样本中获得的一组参数偏好权重、非参数偏好权重和有序健康状态评估技术来创建健康效用评分。
透析组的效用值低于非透析组。年龄与健康效用评分之间存在显著关系:随着年龄的增加,健康效用评分降低。糖尿病与透析患者较低的健康效用评分相关,而在我们的逐步回归模型中,其他协变量未达到统计学显著水平。参数贝叶斯模型和标准博弈法得出了相同的结果,而非参数法与参数法之间的相关性高于0.9。
在我们的研究队列中,健康效用评分相对于一般人群标准较低。对CKD患者进行纵向评估以捕捉健康效用评分可能的波动,或许能提供有用信息。