Departments of Medicine and *Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1997 Winter;3(4):265-76.
: We evaluated the use of utility measurements to assess the quality of life of patients with Crohn's disease. Utility scores were obtained using the Time Trade-Off (TTO), Standard Gamble, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) methods in 180 consecutive patients with Crohn's disease. The mean utility scores of patients with a spectrum of disease severity were compared with other measures of disease activity to assess the operating properties of these instruments. All methods of utility estimation yielded lower mean scores in patients with more severe disease. (Remission versus chronically active, therapy resistant disease: TTO 0.96 versus 0.88; Standard Gamble 0.88 versus 0.74; VAS 0.84 versus 0.61). TTO scores were consistently higher than those derived by the other methods (p = 0.001). The utility scores were reliable in patients who were stable (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.55-0.84), but were less responsive than the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (responsiveness ratio 0.97-1.3 versus 2.10) to changes in disease severity. Patients with active Crohn's disease have decreased quality of life as measured by utility scores. Although utilities are valid and reliable quality of life assessments, they are less responsive than other measures of outcome used for clinical trials.
我们评估了效用测量在评估克罗恩病患者生活质量中的应用。在 180 例连续克罗恩病患者中,使用时间权衡法(TTO)、标准博弈法和视觉模拟评分法(VAS)获得效用评分。比较了具有不同疾病严重程度谱的患者的平均效用评分与其他疾病活动度指标,以评估这些工具的操作特性。所有的效用估计方法在疾病严重程度较高的患者中均得出较低的平均评分。(缓解期与慢性活动期、治疗抵抗性疾病:TTO 0.96 与 0.88;标准博弈法 0.88 与 0.74;VAS 0.84 与 0.61)。TTO 评分始终高于其他方法得出的评分(p = 0.001)。在病情稳定的患者中,效用评分具有可靠性(组内相关系数 0.55-0.84),但对疾病严重程度变化的反应不如克罗恩病活动指数(反应比 0.97-1.3 与 2.10)。患有活动期克罗恩病的患者生活质量下降,表现为效用评分降低。尽管效用是有效的和可靠的生活质量评估方法,但它们对临床试验中使用的其他结局指标的反应性较低。