Gardony Aaron L, Eddy Marianna D, Brunyé Tad T, Taylor Holly A
Center for Applied Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Medford, MA, United States; Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States; Cognitive Science Team, U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Natick, MA, United States.
Center for Applied Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Medford, MA, United States; Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States; Cognitive Science Team, U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Natick, MA, United States.
Brain Cogn. 2017 Nov;118:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
The classic mental rotation task (MRT; Shepard & Metzler, 1971) is commonly thought to measure mental rotation, a cognitive process involving covert simulation of motor rotation. Yet much research suggests that the MRT recruits both motor simulation and other analytic cognitive strategies that depend on visuospatial representation and visual working memory (WM). In the present study, we investigated cognitive strategies in the MRT using time-frequency analysis of EEG and independent component analysis. We scrutinized sensorimotor mu (µ) power reduction, associated with motor simulation, parietal alpha (pα) power reduction, associated with visuospatial representation, and frontal midline theta (fmθ) power enhancement, associated with WM maintenance and manipulation. µ power increased concomitant with increasing task difficulty, suggesting reduced use of motor simulation, while pα decreased and fmθ power increased, suggesting heightened use of visuospatial representation processing and WM, respectively. These findings suggest that MRT performance involves flexibly trading off between cognitive strategies, namely a motor simulation-based mental rotation strategy and WM-intensive analytic strategies based on task difficulty. Flexible cognitive strategy use may be a domain-general cognitive principle that underlies aptitude and spatial intelligence in a variety of cognitive domains. We close with discussion of the present study's implications as well as future directions.
经典心理旋转任务(MRT;谢泼德和梅茨勒,1971)通常被认为是用于测量心理旋转的,这是一种涉及对运动旋转进行隐蔽模拟的认知过程。然而,大量研究表明,MRT既招募了运动模拟,也招募了其他依赖于视觉空间表征和视觉工作记忆(WM)的分析性认知策略。在本研究中,我们使用脑电图的时频分析和独立成分分析来研究MRT中的认知策略。我们仔细研究了与运动模拟相关的感觉运动μ(µ)功率降低、与视觉空间表征相关的顶叶α(pα)功率降低以及与WM维持和操作相关的额中线θ(fmθ)功率增强。µ功率随着任务难度的增加而增加,这表明运动模拟的使用减少,而pα降低且fmθ功率增加,这分别表明视觉空间表征处理和WM的使用增加。这些发现表明,MRT表现涉及在认知策略之间灵活权衡,即基于运动模拟的心理旋转策略和基于任务难度的WM密集型分析策略。灵活使用认知策略可能是一种领域通用的认知原则,它是各种认知领域中能力和空间智能的基础。我们最后讨论了本研究的意义以及未来的方向。