Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
St-Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1564-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
This study sought to assess the influence of baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality as well as sudden cardiac death (SCD) among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Few data exist regarding the late clinical impact of pre-existing RBBB in TAVR recipients.
A total of 3,527 patients (mean age 82 ± 8 years, 50.1% men) were evaluated according to the presence of RBBB on baseline electrocardiography. Intraventricular conduction abnormalities were classified according to the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology Foundation, and Heart Rhythm Society recommendations for standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. TAVR complications and causes of death were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions.
RBBB was present on baseline electrocardiography in 362 patients (10.3%) and associated with higher 30-day rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (40.1% vs. 13.5%; p < 0.001) and death (10.2% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.024). At a mean follow-up of 20 ± 18 months, pre-existing RBBB was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 1.63; p = 0.014) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.89; p = 0.006) but not with SCD (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.32; p = 0.57). Patients with pre-existing RBBB and without PPI at discharge from the index hospitalization had the highest 2-year risk for cardiovascular death (27.8%; 95% CI: 20.9% to 36.1%; log-rank p = 0.007). In a subanalysis of 1,245 patients without PPI at discharge from the index hospitalization and with complete follow-up regarding the need for PPI, pre-existing RBBB was independently associated with the composite of SCD and PPI (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.16 to 6.17; p = 0.023).
Pre-existing RBBB was found in 10% of TAVR recipients and was associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Patients with baseline RBBB without permanent pacemakers at hospital discharge may be at especially high risk for high-degree atrioventricular block and/or SCD during follow-up. Future studies should evaluate strategies aimed at the early detection of patients at risk for late development of high-degree atrioventricular block.
本研究旨在评估基线右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)对行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和心源性猝死(SCD)的影响。
关于 TAVR 受者中预先存在的 RBBB 的晚期临床影响的数据很少。
根据基线心电图是否存在 RBBB,对 3527 例(平均年龄 82±8 岁,50.1%为男性)患者进行评估。根据美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学院基金会和心律协会关于心电图标准化和解释的建议,对室内传导异常进行分类。TAVR 并发症和死亡原因根据瓣膜学术研究联合会 2 定义定义。
基线心电图存在 RBBB 的患者 362 例(10.3%),30 天内永久性起搏器植入(PPI)的发生率较高(40.1% vs. 13.5%;p<0.001)和死亡率(10.2% vs. 6.9%;p=0.024)。平均随访 20±18 个月后,预先存在的 RBBB 与全因死亡率(风险比[HR]:1.31;95%置信区间[CI]:1.06 至 1.63;p=0.014)和心血管死亡率(HR:1.45;95%CI:1.11 至 1.89;p=0.006)独立相关,但与 SCD 无关(HR:0.71;95%CI:0.22 至 2.32;p=0.57)。在索引住院期间出院时无 PPI 的预先存在 RBBB 患者,2 年内发生心血管死亡的风险最高(27.8%;95%CI:20.9%至 36.1%;对数秩检验 p=0.007)。在索引住院期间出院时无 PPI 的 1245 例患者的亚组分析中,并且对 PPI 的需求进行了完整的随访,预先存在的 RBBB 与 SCD 和 PPI 的复合终点独立相关(HR:2.68;95%CI:1.16 至 6.17;p=0.023)。
TAVR 受者中有 10%存在预先存在的 RBBB,与较差的临床结局相关。在索引住院期间出院时无永久性起搏器的患者,在随访期间可能有较高的发生高度房室传导阻滞和/或 SCD 的风险。未来的研究应评估旨在早期发现有发生晚期高度房室传导阻滞风险的患者的策略。