• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后右束支传导阻滞患者的高级传导障碍的时间和演变。

Timing and evolution of advanced conduction disturbances in patients with right bundle branch block undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Europace. 2020 Oct 1;22(10):1537-1546. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa149.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euaa149
PMID:32869083
Abstract

AIMS

This study sought to determine the timing and evolution over time of advanced conduction disturbances (CDs) in patients with baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and ten consecutive patients with pre-existing RBBB were included (out of 1341, 8.2%). All arrhythmias during the hospitalization period were recorded. Follow-up was performed at 30 days, 1 year, and yearly thereafter. Conduction recovery and ventricular pacing percentage (VPP) was evaluated at 30 days in those patients with permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI). Sixty-one (55.5%) patients suffered advanced CDs [97% complete or high-degree atrioventricular block (CHB/HAVB)], and the vast majority (98%) occurred within the first 3 days post-procedure (intraprocedural: 85%). Fifty-two (47.3%) patients had PPMI (vs. 11.0% in non-RBBB patients, P < 0.001). Ventricular pacing percentage at 1 month was higher in patients with persistent-intraprocedural CHB/HAVB compared to those with transient-intraprocedural or post-procedural CHB/HAVB [99 (interquartile range, IQR 97-100)% vs. 72 (IQR 30-99)%, P = 0.02]. Complete recovery (VPP < 1%) was observed in only one patient (2%) with CHB/HAVB. After hospital discharge, no symptomatic bradyarrhythmias or sudden death occurred within 30 days. Patients with pre-existing RBBB exhibited a higher risk of PPMI at 4-year follow-up (26% vs. 8% in non-RBBB patients, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with pre-existing RBBB, the vast majority of advanced CDs occurred within the 3 days following TAVR, and most did not recover at 1-month, particularly those with intra-procedural persistent CHB/HAVB. These results should help to determine the hospitalization length and timing of PPMI in RBBB patients undergoing TAVR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定基线右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后,高级传导障碍(CDs)的发生时间和随时间的演变。

方法和结果

连续纳入 110 例基线存在 RBBB 的患者(共 1341 例,占 8.2%)。记录住院期间的所有心律失常。在 30 天、1 年和此后每年进行随访。对植入永久性起搏器(PPMI)的患者在 30 天评估传导恢复和心室起搏百分比(VPP)。61 例(55.5%)患者患有高级 CDs[97%完全或高度房室传导阻滞(CHB/HAVB)],绝大多数(98%)发生在术后 3 天内(术中:85%)。52 例(47.3%)患者行 PPMI(而非 RBBB 患者的 11.0%,P<0.001)。与术中一过性或术后 CHB/HAVB 相比,持续术中 CHB/HAVB 的患者在 1 个月时心室起搏百分比更高[99%(四分位距 IQR 97-100)%比 72%(IQR 30-99)%,P=0.02]。仅 1 例(2%)CHB/HAVB 患者完全恢复(VPP<1%)。出院后 30 天内,无症状缓慢性心律失常或猝死发生。在 4 年随访时,基线存在 RBBB 的患者 PPMI 风险更高(26%比非 RBBB 患者的 8%,P<0.001)。

结论

在基线存在 RBBB 的患者中,绝大多数高级 CDs 发生在 TAVR 后 3 天内,大多数患者在 1 个月时未恢复,特别是术中持续 CHB/HAVB 的患者。这些结果有助于确定 RBBB 患者行 TAVR 的住院时间和 PPMI 时机。

相似文献

1
Timing and evolution of advanced conduction disturbances in patients with right bundle branch block undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后右束支传导阻滞患者的高级传导障碍的时间和演变。
Europace. 2020 Oct 1;22(10):1537-1546. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa149.
2
Intraprocedural high-degree atrioventricular block or complete heart block in transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients with no prior intraventricular conduction disturbances.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者术中出现高度房室传导阻滞或完全性心脏阻滞,且术前无室内传导障碍。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 1;95(5):982-990. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28323. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring Following Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的门诊心电图监测。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 27;14(24):2711-2722. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.039.
4
Clinical Impact of Baseline Right Bundle Branch Block in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者基线右束支传导阻滞的临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1564-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
Late arrhythmias in patients with new-onset persistent left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a balloon-expandable valve.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞患者的迟发性心律失常。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Oct;18(10):1733-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 May 31.
6
Optimizing Care of Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.优化行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的右束支传导阻滞患者的护理。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Sep;42:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
7
Prophylactic permanent pacemaker strategy in patients with right bundle branch block undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的右束支传导阻滞患者的预防性永久起搏器策略。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 1;98(7):E1017-E1025. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29914. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
8
Impact of New-Onset Right Bundle-Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Permanent Pacemaker Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发右束支传导阻滞对永久性起搏器植入的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e032777. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032777. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
9
A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后植入起搏器的高预测风险模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
10
Temporal Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高度房室传导阻滞的时间发生率及预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 18;10(10):e020033. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020033. Epub 2021 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of conduction disturbances after TAVI: the last step towards early discharge.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后传导障碍的管理:迈向早期出院的最后一步。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 May 28;22(5):534-546. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.05.004.
2
Cardiac pacing and lead devices management: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal.心脏起搏和导联设备管理:EP Europace 杂志 25 年的研究成果。
Europace. 2023 Aug 25;25(8). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad202.
3
Conduction Disturbance, Pacemaker Rates, and Hospital Length of Stay Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with the Sapien 3 Valve.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(使用Sapien 3瓣膜)后的传导障碍、起搏器频率及住院时间
Struct Heart. 2022 Mar 30;6(3):100019. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100019. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Risk Stratification and Management of Advanced Conduction Disturbances Following TAVI in Patients With Pre-Existing RBBB.已有右束支传导阻滞患者经导管主动脉瓣置入术后晚期传导障碍的风险分层与管理
Struct Heart. 2022 Mar 17;6(1):100006. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100006. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Evaluation of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in pre-existing right bundle branch block patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve.对2021年欧洲心脏病学会指南在接受球囊扩张瓣膜经导管主动脉瓣植入术的既往存在右束支传导阻滞患者中的评估。
Eur Heart J Open. 2022 Mar 11;2(2):oeac014. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac014. eCollection 2022 Mar.