• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后初始心电图无变化患者中高度房室传导阻滞的发生率及预测因素

Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade AV Block in Patients With Initially Unchanged Electrocardiogram After TAVR.

作者信息

Elhadi Mohamed, Alabdaljabar Mohamad S, Lane Conor, Deshmukh Abhishek J, Gulati Rajiv, Cha Yong-Mei, Eleid Mackram F

机构信息

Division of Interventional Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 May 27;4(7):103666. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103666. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103666
PMID:40933097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12418428/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared patients with baseline conduction disease that is unchanged on the immediate post-TAVR echocardiogram (ECG) to patients with normal baseline and post-TAVR ECG (control group).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) between February 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

In total, 1069 patients were included in the study: 825 controls, 44 with isolated PR of >240 milliseconds, 93 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and 107 with right bundle branch block (RBBB). Early HAVB (<24 hours post-TAVR) occurred more frequently in the RBBB group compared with controls (11.2% vs 0.6%; < .001). Early HAVB incidence was similar between the control, isolated PR >240, and LBBB groups (0.6%, 0%, and 1.1%, respectively). Delayed HAVB (>24 hours post-TAVR) was most frequent in the RBBB group (6.5% vs 1.5%; < .001), with higher incidence also observed in PR >240 and LBBB groups compared with that in control (4.5% vs 1.5%; = .14; and 4.3% vs 1.5%; = .06, respectivley). Most of HAVB events in the control, isolated PR >240 and LBBB groups were delayed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite no immediate change in post-TAVR ECG, 17.8% of patients with preexisting RBBB developed HAVB, mostly within 24 hours. This emphasizes the need for inpatient monitoring for at least 24 hours in this group. Conversely, in patients with isolated PR >240 milliseconds and LBBB, the incidence of HAVB was relatively low (5%), with the majority occurring after 24 hours. Potentially, same-day discharge with ambulatory ECG monitoring may be suitable for these patients.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后,高度房室传导阻滞(HAVB)较为常见。我们将TAVR术后即刻超声心动图(ECG)显示基线传导疾病无变化的患者与基线及TAVR术后ECG均正常的患者(对照组)进行了比较。

方法

对2012年2月至2021年12月在梅奥诊所(明尼苏达州罗切斯特)接受TAVR的连续患者进行回顾性研究。

结果

本研究共纳入1069例患者:825例对照组,44例孤立性PR间期>240毫秒,93例左束支传导阻滞(LBBB),107例右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)。与对照组相比,RBBB组早期HAVB(TAVR术后<24小时)发生率更高(11.2%对0.6%;P<0.001)。对照组、孤立性PR间期>240毫秒组和LBBB组的早期HAVB发生率相似(分别为0.6%、0%和1.1%)。延迟性HAVB(TAVR术后>24小时)在RBBB组最为常见(6.5%对1.5%;P<0.001),PR间期>240毫秒组和LBBB组与对照组相比发生率也更高(分别为4.5%对1.5%;P=0.14;4.3%对1.5%;P=0.06)。对照组、孤立性PR间期>240毫秒组和LBBB组的大多数HAVB事件为延迟性。

结论

尽管TAVR术后ECG无即刻变化,但17.8%的既往有RBBB的患者发生了HAVB,大多在24小时内。这强调了该组患者需要至少住院监测24小时。相反,在孤立性PR间期>240毫秒和LBBB的患者中,HAVB发生率相对较低(5%),大多数发生在24小时后。对于这些患者,门诊ECG监测下当日出院可能是合适的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/67d1281cce62/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/e3d1dc654026/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/b3b63f42812e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/8d51b4d8942d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/a780795db97c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/67d1281cce62/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/e3d1dc654026/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/b3b63f42812e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/8d51b4d8942d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/a780795db97c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/12418428/67d1281cce62/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade AV Block in Patients With Initially Unchanged Electrocardiogram After TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后初始心电图无变化患者中高度房室传导阻滞的发生率及预测因素
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 May 27;4(7):103666. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103666. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
New-Onset RBBB After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发右束支传导阻滞:永久起搏器植入的发生率及危险因素
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2025.06.013.
3
The Association between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Approach and New-Onset Bundle Branch Blocks.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)方法与新发束支传导阻滞之间的关联
Cardiol Ther. 2019 May 23;8(2):357-364. doi: 10.1007/s40119-019-0137-2.
4
The Association Between Newly Acquired Permanent Left Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and New-Onset Cardiomyopathy.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新获得性永久性左束支传导阻滞与新发心肌病之间的关联
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Sep;36(9):2196-2204. doi: 10.1111/jce.16782. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
5
Elevated myocardial extracellular volume fraction is associated with the development of conduction pathway defects following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心肌细胞外体积分数升高与传导通路缺陷的发展有关。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov;104(5):1119-1128. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31136. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
6
Factors associated with heart failure events in patients with new-onset persistent left bundle branch block at discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后出院时新发持续性左束支传导阻滞患者心力衰竭事件的相关因素。
Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jul;22(7):e132-e140. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.035. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
7
Temporal Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高度房室传导阻滞的时间发生率及预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 18;10(10):e020033. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020033. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block and Periprocedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞和经皮心脏永久起搏器植入对患者临床结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;9(5):e003635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003635.
9
Incidence, Predictors, and Management of Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: The TRIPLACE Registry.经导管三尖瓣置换术后传导障碍的发生率、预测因素及管理:TRIPLACE注册研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul 28;18(14):1789-1799. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.05.029. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
10
Smartwatch-Detected Arrhythmias in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Analysis of the SMART TAVR Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后智能手表检测到的心律失常:SMART TAVR 试验分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 19;26:e41843. doi: 10.2196/41843.

本文引用的文献

1
Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring Following Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的门诊心电图监测。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 27;14(24):2711-2722. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.039.
2
Prophylactic Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block Undergoing TAVR.接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的右束支传导阻滞患者的预防性永久起搏器植入
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 14;14(11):1272-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.043.
3
Temporal Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高度房室传导阻滞的时间发生率及预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 18;10(10):e020033. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020033. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
Systematic Approach to High Implantation of SAPIEN-3 Valve Achieves a Lower Rate of Conduction Abnormalities Including Pacemaker Implantation.系统方法提高 SAPIEN-3 瓣膜植入率,降低包括起搏器植入在内的传导异常发生率。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan;14(1):e009407. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009407. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的STS-ACC TVT注册研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 24;76(21):2492-2516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.595.
6
2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Conduction Disturbances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.2020 年美国心脏病学会专家共识决策路径:经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍管理——美国心脏病学会解决方案监督委员会报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 17;76(20):2391-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
7
Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天连续动态监测对诊断房室传导阻滞迟发的作用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007635. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Development of a Risk Score to Predict New Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测新起搏器植入风险评分的开发。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2133-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.015.
9
Ambulatory Rhythm Monitoring to Detect Late High-Grade Atrioventricular Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后动态心电图监测晚期高度房室传导阻滞。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2538-2547. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.068.
10
Impact of Preexisting Left Bundle Branch Block in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Recipients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者左束支传导阻滞的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e006927. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006927.