Ober M, Scharrer A, Novack G D, Lue J C
Ophthalmologica. 1986;192(3):159-64. doi: 10.1159/000309631.
We evaluated the ocular comfort of 0.5% levobunolol hydrochloride and 0.6% metipranolol hydrochloride ophthalmic solutions in a randomized, double-masked, paired-comparison clinical trial. The drugs were given twice daily for 7 days to 16 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Patients rated comfort in terms of the severity of burning and/or stinging. For both drugs, the severity rating of ocular discomfort was low, averaging between 1 and 2 on a scale of 0-10. At initial and follow-up visits, the mean severity rating of burning or stinging with metipranolol was 2, slightly greater than the mean score of 1 with levobunolol. At 55% (26 of 47) of the patient visits, the patients rated levobunolol as more comfortable than metipranolol. Metipranolol (Betamann; Mann) was rated as more comfortable than levobunolol at only 9% (4 of 47) of the patient visits. The duration of burning and stinging was also rated as longer lasting with metipranolol treatment than with levobunolol (Vistagan; Pharma-Allergan) treatment. Although little ocular discomfort was reported for either drug, the majority of the patients tested rated levobunolol the more comfortable of the two drugs.
我们在一项随机、双盲、配对比较的临床试验中评估了0.5%盐酸左布诺洛尔和0.6%盐酸美替洛尔滴眼液的眼部舒适度。这两种药物每天给药两次,连续7天,用于治疗16例开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者。患者根据烧灼感和/或刺痛感的严重程度对舒适度进行评分。对于这两种药物,眼部不适的严重程度评分都较低,在0至10分的量表上平均为1至2分。在初次和随访就诊时,美替洛尔引起的烧灼感或刺痛感的平均严重程度评分为2分,略高于左布诺洛尔的平均1分。在55%(47次就诊中的26次)的患者就诊中,患者认为左布诺洛尔比美替洛尔更舒适。在仅9%(47次就诊中的4次)的患者就诊中,美替洛尔(Betamann;Mann)被认为比左布诺洛尔更舒适。美替洛尔治疗引起的烧灼感和刺痛感的持续时间也被认为比左布诺洛尔(Vistagan;Pharma - Allergan)治疗更长。尽管两种药物报告的眼部不适都很少,但大多数接受测试的患者认为左布诺洛尔是两种药物中更舒适的一种。