Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Victoria, Australia; The Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Mental Health, Australia.
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Genes, molecules and neural circuits that are associated with, or confer risk to developing schizophrenia have been studied and mapped. It is hypothesized that certain neural systems may counterbalance familial risk of schizophrenia, and thus confer resilience to developing the disorder. This study sought to identify resting-state functional brain connectivity (rs-FC) representing putative risk or resilience endophenotypes in schizophrenia.
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) was performed in 42 individuals with treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), 16 unaffected first-degree family members (UFM) and 42 healthy controls. Whole-brain rs-FC networks were mapped for each individual and analysed graph theoretically to identify network markers associated with schizophrenia risk or resilience.
The ~900 functional connections showing between-group differences were operationalized as conferring: i) resilience, ii) risk, or iii) precipitating risk and/or illness effects. Approximately 95% of connections belonged to the latter two categories, with substantially fewer connections associated with resilience. Schizophrenia risk primarily involved reduced frontal and occipital rs-FC, with patients showing additional reduced frontal and temporal rs-FC. Functional brain networks were characterized by greater local efficiency in UFM, compared to TRS and controls.
TRS and UFM share frontal and occipital rs-FC deficits, representing a 'risk' endophenotype. Additional reductions in frontal and temporal rs-FC appear to be associated with risk that precipitates psychosis in vulnerable individuals, or may be due to other illness-related effects, such as medication. Functional brain networks are more topologically resilient in UFM compared to TRS, which may protect UFM from psychosis onset despite familial liability.
与精神分裂症发病相关或导致发病风险增加的基因、分子和神经回路已被研究和定位。假设某些神经系统可能会抵消精神分裂症的家族风险,从而对发病产生抵抗力。本研究旨在确定代表精神分裂症潜在风险或抵抗能力的静息态功能脑连接(rs-FC)。
对 42 名抗精神病药物治疗抵抗的精神分裂症患者(TRS)、16 名无精神分裂症家族史的一级亲属(UFM)和 42 名健康对照者进行静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)。对每个个体的全脑 rs-FC 网络进行映射,并进行图论分析,以确定与精神分裂症风险或抵抗能力相关的网络标记。
~900 个显示组间差异的功能连接被操作化为:i)抵抗,ii)风险,或 iii)引发风险和/或疾病效应。约 95%的连接属于后两者,与抵抗相关的连接要少得多。精神分裂症风险主要涉及额和枕部 rs-FC 减少,患者表现出额外的额和颞部 rs-FC 减少。与 TRS 和对照组相比,UFM 的功能脑网络表现出更大的局部效率。
TRS 和 UFM 共享额和枕部 rs-FC 缺陷,代表一种“风险”表型。额和颞部 rs-FC 的进一步减少可能与易患个体发病的风险有关,或者可能是由于其他与疾病相关的影响,如药物治疗。与 TRS 相比,UFM 的功能脑网络更具拓扑弹性,这可能会保护 UFM 免受精神病发作的影响,尽管存在家族易感性。