Suppr超能文献

卵巢肿块:鉴别良恶性——国际卵巢肿瘤分析超声规则的价值

Ovarian mass-differentiating benign from malignant: the value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ultrasound rules.

作者信息

Abramowicz Jacques S, Timmerman Dirk

机构信息

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):652-660. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Abstract

Ovarian cancer, the fifth most common cause of cancer death among women, has the highest mortality rate of all gynecologic cancers. General survival rate is <50% but can reach 90% if disease is detected early. Ultrasound is presently the best modality to differentiate between benign and malignant status. The patient with a malignant mass should be referred to an oncology surgeon since results have been shown to be superior to treatment by a specialist. Several ultrasound-based scoring systems exist for assessing the risk of an ovarian tumor to be malignant. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group published 2 such systems: the ultrasound Simple Rules and the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa model. The Simple Rules classifies a tumor as benign, malignant, or indeterminate and the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa model determines the risk for a tumor to be benign or malignant and, if malignant, the risk of various stages. Sensitivity of the Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa model (using a cut-off of 10% to predict malignancy) are 92% and 96.5%, respectively, and specificities are 96% and 71.3%, respectively. These models are the best predictive tests for the preoperative classification of adnexal tumors. Their intent is to help the specialist make management decisions when faced with a patient with a persistent ovarian mass. The models are simple, are easy to use, and have been validated in multiple reports but not in the United States. We suggest they should be validated and widely introduced into medical practice in the United States.

摘要

卵巢癌是女性癌症死亡的第五大常见原因,在所有妇科癌症中死亡率最高。总体生存率<50%,但如果疾病早期被发现,生存率可达90%。超声目前是区分良性和恶性状态的最佳检查方式。恶性肿块患者应转诊至肿瘤外科医生处,因为研究结果表明,肿瘤外科医生的治疗效果优于专科医生。目前存在几种基于超声的评分系统,用于评估卵巢肿瘤为恶性的风险。国际卵巢肿瘤分析小组公布了2种这样的系统:超声简单规则和附件区不同肿瘤的评估模型。简单规则将肿瘤分为良性、恶性或不确定,附件区不同肿瘤的评估模型确定肿瘤为良性或恶性的风险,如果是恶性,则确定不同分期的风险。简单规则和附件区不同肿瘤的评估模型(使用10%的临界值预测恶性)的敏感度分别为92%和96.5%,特异度分别为96%和71.3%。这些模型是附件区肿瘤术前分类的最佳预测性检查。其目的是帮助专科医生在面对持续性卵巢肿块患者时做出管理决策。这些模型简单、易于使用,并且已在多篇报告中得到验证,但在美国尚未得到验证。我们建议它们应在美国得到验证并广泛引入医疗实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验