Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15;245:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.051. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
Although exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improves exercise capacity of coronary artery disease patients, it is unclear which training characteristic determines this improvement. Total energy expenditure and its constituent training characteristics (training intensity, session frequency, session duration and programme length) vary considerably among clinical trials, making it hard to compare studies directly. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-regression analysis to assess the effect of total energy expenditure and its constituent training characteristics on exercise capacity.
We identified randomised controlled trials comparing continuous aerobic exercise training with usual care for patients with coronary artery disease. Studies were included when training intensity, session frequency, session duration and programme length was described, and exercise capacity was reported in peakVO. Energy expenditure was calculated from the four training characteristics. The effect of training characteristics on exercise capacity was determined using mixed effects linear regression analyses. The analyses were performed with and without total energy expenditure as covariate.
Twenty studies were included in the analyses. The mean difference in peakVO between the intervention group and control group was 3.97ml·min·kg (p<0.01, 95% CI 2.86 to 5.07). Total energy expenditure was significantly related to improvement of exercise capacity (effect size 0.91ml·min·kg per 100J·kg, p<0.01, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.06), no effect was found for its constituent training characteristics after adjustment for total energy expenditure.
We conclude that the design of an exercise programme should primarily be aimed at optimising total energy expenditure rather than on one specific training characteristic.
尽管基于运动的心脏康复可以提高冠心病患者的运动能力,但目前尚不清楚哪种训练特征决定了这种改善。临床试验中总能量消耗及其组成训练特征(训练强度、训练频率、训练持续时间和方案长度)差异很大,使得难以直接比较研究。因此,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃回归分析,以评估总能量消耗及其组成训练特征对运动能力的影响。
我们确定了比较连续有氧运动训练与冠心病患者常规护理的随机对照试验。当描述训练强度、训练频率、训练持续时间和方案长度,并且以峰值 VO 报告运动能力时,研究才被纳入。从四个训练特征计算能量消耗。使用混合效应线性回归分析确定训练特征对运动能力的影响。分析分别在包含和不包含总能量消耗作为协变量的情况下进行。
有 20 项研究纳入分析。干预组与对照组之间峰值 VO 的平均差异为 3.97ml·min·kg(p<0.01,95%CI 2.86 至 5.07)。总能量消耗与运动能力的改善显著相关(效应大小为每 100J·kg 增加 0.91ml·min·kg,p<0.01,95%CI 0.77 至 1.06),但在调整总能量消耗后,其组成训练特征对运动能力的影响不显著。
我们的结论是,运动方案的设计应主要旨在优化总能量消耗,而不是针对特定的训练特征。