• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期状态是肝再次移植患者生存不良的预测因素吗?

Is Elective Status a Predictor of Poor Survival in Liver Retransplantation?

作者信息

Stankiewicz R, Kornasiewicz O, Grąt M, Lewandowski Z, Gorski Z, Krawczyk M

机构信息

Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2017 Jul-Aug;49(6):1364-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.083.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.083
PMID:28736008
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orthotopic liver retransplantation (reLT) is considered to have poorer outcomes than primary transplantation. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of medical urgency status as a predictor of patient survival after reLT.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients who underwent reLT were included in this retrospective study. Urgent or elective status was based on the judgment of the surgical team, selected variables, and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with patient survival following reLT.

RESULTS

Overall survival of the patient cohort was 57% at 1 year and 54.3% at 3 years after reTL. Survival in urgent-status patients was 68.8% and 63.4% at 1 and 3 years, respectively, whereas the survival rate for elective patients was 40.0% at both time points. Mortality was significantly associated with elective status (hazard ratio [HR], 2.42; P = .046) at 1 year, but was no longer significant (HR, 2.19; P < .069) after 3 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective status is associated with poorer outcome. Patient selection determines long-term survival more than any other single factor, so for patients designated to an elective status, prompt retransplantation should be encouraged.

摘要

背景

原位肝再次移植(reLT)被认为比初次移植的预后更差。本研究的目的是分析作为reLT后患者生存预测指标的医疗紧急状态的影响。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了49例行reLT的患者。紧急或择期状态基于手术团队的判断、选定变量以及终末期肝病模型评分。进行多变量分析以确定与reLT后患者生存相关的变量。

结果

患者队列在reTL后1年的总生存率为57%,3年时为54.3%。紧急状态患者在1年和3年时的生存率分别为68.8%和63.4%,而择期患者在两个时间点的生存率均为40.0%。1年时死亡率与择期状态显著相关(风险比[HR],2.42;P = 0.046),但在随访3年后不再显著(HR,2.19;P < 0.069)。

结论

择期状态与较差的预后相关。患者选择比任何其他单一因素更能决定长期生存,因此对于被指定为择期状态的患者,应鼓励及时进行再次移植。

相似文献

1
Is Elective Status a Predictor of Poor Survival in Liver Retransplantation?择期状态是肝再次移植患者生存不良的预测因素吗?
Transplant Proc. 2017 Jul-Aug;49(6):1364-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.083.
2
Predictive factors for survival and score application in liver retransplantation for hepatitis C recurrence.丙型肝炎复发肝再次移植生存的预测因素及评分应用
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 14;22(18):4547-58. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4547.
3
Predictive index for long-term survival after retransplantation of the liver in adult recipients: analysis of a 26-year experience in a single center.成人肝移植后长期生存的预测指标:单中心 26 年经验分析。
Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):444-8; discussion 448-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c5878.
4
Decision for retransplantation of the liver: an experience- and cost-based analysis.肝脏再次移植的决策:基于经验和成本的分析
Ann Surg. 2002 Dec;236(6):713-21; discussion 721. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000036264.66247.65.
5
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after early versus late liver retransplantation: a single-center experience.早期与晚期肝移植后短期和长期结局比较:单中心经验。
J Surg Res. 2013 Dec;185(2):877-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
6
Early Vs Late Liver Retransplantation: Different Characteristics and Prognostic Factors.早期与晚期肝脏再次移植:不同特征及预后因素
Transplant Proc. 2018 Nov;50(9):2668-2674. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.040. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
Optimization of liver grafts in liver retransplantation: a European single-center experience.肝再次移植中肝脏移植物的优化:一项欧洲单中心经验
Surgery. 2008 Nov;144(5):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.029. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
8
Defining long-term outcomes with living donor liver transplantation in North America.界定北美活体供肝移植的长期预后。
Ann Surg. 2015 Sep;262(3):465-75; discussion 473-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001383.
9
Repeat liver retransplantation: rationale and outcomes.再次肝移植:理论依据与结果
Clin Transplant. 2016 Mar;30(3):312-9. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12691. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
10
Effects of graft quality on non-urgent liver retransplantation survival: should we avoid high-risk donors?移植物质量对非紧急肝再移植存活的影响:我们是否应该避免高危供体?
World J Surg. 2012 Dec;36(12):2914-22. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1757-z.