Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics and Maxillo-facial Rehabilitation, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via San Vitale 59, 40125, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics and Maxillo-facial Rehabilitation, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via San Vitale 59, 40125, Bologna, Italy.
J Dent. 2017 Oct;65:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
The aim of this 5-year randomized controlled trial was to compare the longevity and clinical behavior of single posterior crowns made with pressable ceramic on zirconia and on metal frameworks, and if failures occur, to delineate the contributing factors.
72 patients, who needed the covering of at least a molar and/or premolar, were included in the study. All teeth were endodontically treated, with absence of periapical lesion or active periodontitis. Ninety single crowns were made with zirconia or metal framework and covered with pressable veneering ceramics. Two independent examiners assessed the survival of restorations at 6 months, 1-4 and 5 years after restoration placement including periapical radiographs, intraoral photographs, and USPHS modified criteria. The statistical analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method.
One core fracture occurred in Zircad/Zirpress crowns and one metal ceramic crown was lost for root fracture. Chipping fracture of the veneering ceramic was detected in 2 metal-ceramic crowns and in 3 zirconia-based crowns. The Estimate Cumulative Survival (ECS) and the Estimate Cumulative Success (ECSs) with standard deviation (SE) were respectively 97,73±2,19 and 92,64±4,14 for zirconia-based crowns whereas 97,44±2,39 and 91,11±4,27 for porcelain fused to metal crowns.
The present randomized controlled trial shows that the survival of zirconia-based and metal-based single crowns is similar over a follow-up period of 5 years. No significant differences in esthetic, functional and biological outcomes were demonstrated between the two groups. The main failure mode was the chipping fracture of the veneering ceramic in both materials. Study number on ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02758457.
According to the results of this clinical study, zirconia-based rehabilitations with overpressing veneering technique represent a valid alternative to metal-based for posterior single crown restorations.
本为期 5 年的随机对照试验旨在比较在氧化锆和金属基底上制作的可压瓷单冠的使用寿命和临床行为,如果发生失败,确定相关因素。
本研究纳入了 72 名需要覆盖至少一颗磨牙和/或前磨牙的患者。所有牙齿均进行了根管治疗,无根尖病变或活动性牙周炎。90 个单冠采用氧化锆或金属基底,并覆盖可压瓷贴面。两名独立的检查者在修复后 6 个月、1-4 年和 5 年时通过根尖片、口内照片和 USPHS 改良标准评估修复体的存活率。统计分析采用 Kaplan-Meier 法。
在 Zircad/Zirpress 冠中有 1 例核心断裂,1 例金属烤瓷冠因根折而丢失。在 2 个金属烤瓷冠和 3 个氧化锆基冠中发现了贴面陶瓷的崩瓷断裂。氧化锆基冠的估计累积生存率(ECS)和估计累积成功率(ECSs)分别为 97.73±2.19 和 92.64±4.14,而金属烤瓷冠分别为 97.44±2.39 和 91.11±4.27。
本随机对照试验表明,氧化锆基和金属基单冠在 5 年的随访期内的生存率相似。两组在美学、功能和生物学结果方面无显著差异。两种材料的主要失败模式均为贴面陶瓷的崩瓷。ClinicalTrial.gov 注册号 NCT02758457。
根据这项临床研究的结果,采用超压贴面技术的氧化锆基修复体是后牙单冠修复的金属基修复体的有效替代方案。