Au Trang H, Wang Kai, Stenehjem David, Garrido-Laguna Ignacio
Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
OrigiMed, Shanghai 200000, China.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Jun;8(3):387-404. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.04.
The advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has advanced our understanding of the intrinsic biology of different gastrointestinal (GI) tumor types. The use of novel, more efficient sequencing platforms has improved turnaround times of sequencing results. This is providing real time opportunities to put precision medicine to the test. A number of early phase clinical trials are testing targeted therapies in unique molecularly characterized subsets of patients (baskets). While basket studies are gaining momentum, treatment failures serve to remind us that shifting from a histology-driven to a histology-agnostic approach is unlikely to be a failure-free strategy for a number of tumor types as recently learnt from vemurafenib failure in mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). GI malignancies are clinically and molecularly heterogeneous. Unfortunately, development of biomarkers of response to therapy as well as targeted therapies for GI adenocarcinomas has fallen behind compared to other malignancies. Trastuzumab is the only FDA approved targeted therapy for GI adenocarcinomas for which a biomarker of response ( amplifications) is available. In addition, mutations are known to predict lack of response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, NGS has recently revealed that a number of actionable genetic aberrations are present at low prevalence across different GI malignancies. Prospective randomized clinical trials will determine whether matching actionable aberration with targeted therapy will contribute to improve survival in patients with GI malignancies. Here, we review current evidence for targeted therapies in GI malignancies, as well as application and pitfalls of NGS including tissue testing and liquid biopsies.
新一代测序(NGS)技术的出现,加深了我们对不同胃肠道(GI)肿瘤类型内在生物学特性的理解。新型、更高效测序平台的应用,缩短了测序结果的周转时间。这为精准医学的实际应用提供了契机。一些早期临床试验正在针对具有独特分子特征的患者亚组(分组)测试靶向治疗。虽然分组研究正日益受到关注,但治疗失败提醒我们,从组织学驱动的方法转向不考虑组织学的方法,对于多种肿瘤类型而言,不太可能是一种万无一失的策略,正如最近在BRAF突变的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)中维莫非尼治疗失败所显示的那样。胃肠道恶性肿瘤在临床和分子层面上具有异质性。不幸的是,与其他恶性肿瘤相比,胃肠道腺癌治疗反应生物标志物以及靶向治疗的开发进展滞后。曲妥珠单抗是美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的唯一一种用于胃肠道腺癌的靶向治疗药物,且有相应的反应生物标志物(扩增)。此外,已知NRAS突变可预测晚期结直肠癌(CRC)患者对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂无反应。然而,NGS最近发现,多种可采取行动的基因畸变在不同胃肠道恶性肿瘤中的发生率较低。前瞻性随机临床试验将确定将可采取行动的畸变与靶向治疗相匹配是否有助于提高胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的生存率。在此,我们综述了胃肠道恶性肿瘤靶向治疗的现有证据,以及NGS的应用和陷阱,包括组织检测和液体活检。