Riquelme M Hugo, Wood V David, Martínez F Santiago, Carmona M Fernando, Peña V Axel, Wegner A Adriana
Unidad de Paciente Crítico Pediátrico, Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile.
Escuela de Kinesiología, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago, Chile.
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2017 Jun;88(3):354-359. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062017000300007.
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) frequently involves the development of facial pressure ulcers (FPU). Its prevention considers the empirical use of protective patches between skin and mask, in order to reduce the pressure exerted by it.
To evaluate the effect of protective patches on the pressure exerted by the facial mask, and its impact on the programmed ventilatory parameters.
Bilevel NIV simulated model using full face mask in phantom with a physiological airway (ALS PRO +) in supine position. Forehead, chin and cheekbones pressure were measured using 3 types of standard protective patches versus a control group using pressure sensors (Interlinks Electronics®). The values obtained with the protective patches-mask model were evaluated in the programmed variables maximum inspiratory flow (MIF)), expired tidal volume (Vte) and positive inspiratory pressure (IPAP), with Trilogy 100 ventilator, Respironics®. The programming and recording of the variables was carried out in 8 opportunities in each group by independent operators.
There was no decrease in facial pressure with any of the protective patches compared to the control group. Moltopren increased facial pressure at all support points (p < 0.001), increased leakage, it decreased MIF, Vte and IPAP (p < 0.001). Hydrocolloid patches increased facial pressure only in the left cheekbone, increased leakage and decreased MIF. Polyurethane patches did not produce changes in facial pressure or ventilatory variables.
The use of protective patches of moltopren, hydrocolloid and polyurethane transparent did not contribute to the decrease of the facial pressure. A deleterious effect of the moltopren and hydrocolloid patches was observed on the administration of ventilatory variables, concluding that the non-use of the protective patches allowed a better administration of the programmed parameters.
无创通气(NIV)常常会引发面部压疮(FPU)。其预防措施包括在皮肤与面罩之间经验性地使用保护贴,以减轻面罩施加的压力。
评估保护贴对面罩施加压力的影响及其对预设通气参数的作用。
使用全脸面罩在模拟人体模型(ALS PRO +)上模拟双水平无创通气,人体模型处于仰卧位。使用3种标准保护贴测量前额、下巴和颧骨处的压力,与使用压力传感器(Interlinks Electronics®)的对照组进行对比。使用Respironics® Trilogy 100呼吸机,对保护贴 - 面罩模型所获得的值在预设变量最大吸气流量(MIF)、呼出潮气量(Vte)和吸气正压(IPAP)方面进行评估。每组由独立操作人员对变量进行8次编程和记录。
与对照组相比,任何一种保护贴均未降低面部压力。Moltopren在所有支撑点均增加了面部压力(p < 0.001),增加了漏气,降低了MIF、Vte和IPAP(p < 0.001)。水胶体贴仅在左颧骨处增加了面部压力,增加了漏气并降低了MIF。聚氨酯贴未对面部压力或通气变量产生变化。
使用Moltopren、水胶体和聚氨酯透明保护贴无助于降低面部压力。观察到Moltopren和水胶体贴对通气变量的管理有有害影响,得出不使用保护贴能更好地管理预设参数的结论。