Alqahtani Jaber Saud, Worsley Peter, Voegeli David
Respiratory Care Department, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Southampton General Hospital, Clinical Academic Facility, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Respir Care. 2018 Sep;63(9):1102-1110. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06087.
The use of noninvasive ventilation masks is known to cause damage to facial skin tissue, which affects both the efficacy of the intervention and the patient's quality of life. The use of humidification with noninvasive ventilation is a common practice, but its relative role in the development of facial pressure ulcers has not been fully studied.
A crossover cohort design was used in this study, with 15 healthy volunteers. Each volunteer randomly received both 10 cm HO of CPAP with and without humidification through an oronasal mask. Skin integrity was evaluated by measuring transepidermal water loss, skin hydration, and skin pH at the bridge of the nose. Device-skin interface conditions (pressure and microclimate) were recorded at the bridge of the nose and both cheeks. The pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1α was collected from the nose bridge before and after CPAP application by using a skin analysis tape. Nasal symptoms were collected by using a validated 6-point score.
Humidified CPAP significantly increased transepidermal water loss ( < .001) and skin humidity ( = .02) compared with non-humidified CPAP. There were no significant differences in skin hydration, skin pH, skin temperature, and cytokine expression between both conditions. However, there was a trend of increased median ratios of interleukin-1α concentrations in the humidified CPAP. There was a significant increase in the interface pressure at the bridge of the nose after CPAP application ( = .02), with higher interface pressure values at the nose bridge compared with both left ( = .002) and right ( = .003) cheeks. The participants reported elevated nasal discomfort during non-humidified CPAP.
These findings indicated that noninvasive ventilation with humidification had a potential disrupting effect on the barrier function of facial skin, associated with changes in skin microclimate and function. Further research is required to establish the cause of mask-related skin damage and to evaluate the effects of mask design, application techniques, and air flow and humidity settings.
已知使用无创通气面罩会对面部皮肤组织造成损伤,这既影响干预效果,又影响患者的生活质量。在无创通气中使用湿化是一种常见做法,但其在面部压疮形成中的相对作用尚未得到充分研究。
本研究采用交叉队列设计,纳入15名健康志愿者。每位志愿者通过口鼻面罩随机接受有湿化和无湿化的10 cm水柱持续气道正压通气(CPAP)。通过测量鼻梁处的经表皮水分流失、皮肤水合作用和皮肤pH值来评估皮肤完整性。在鼻梁和双颊记录设备与皮肤的界面状况(压力和微气候)。使用皮肤分析胶带在CPAP应用前后从鼻梁处收集促炎细胞因子白细胞介素-1α。通过使用经过验证的6分制评分收集鼻部症状。
与未湿化的CPAP相比,湿化CPAP显著增加了经表皮水分流失(P<0.001)和皮肤湿度(P=0.02)。两种情况下皮肤水合作用、皮肤pH值、皮肤温度和细胞因子表达均无显著差异。然而,湿化CPAP中白细胞介素-1α浓度的中位数比值有增加趋势。CPAP应用后鼻梁处的界面压力显著增加(P=0.02),与左侧脸颊(P=0.002)和右侧脸颊(P=0.003)相比,鼻梁处的界面压力值更高。参与者报告在未湿化CPAP期间鼻部不适增加。
这些发现表明,湿化的无创通气对面部皮肤的屏障功能有潜在破坏作用,与皮肤微气候和功能的变化有关。需要进一步研究以确定面罩相关皮肤损伤的原因,并评估面罩设计、应用技术以及气流和湿度设置的影响。