Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Nasibeh School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Nursing and Midwifery School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int Wound J. 2024 Jun;21(6):e14909. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14909.
Noninvasive ventilation interfaces are one of the main factors contributing to pressure injuries caused by medical devices. Prevention is still the best course of action when discussing noninvasive ventilation-induced pressure injuries. A systematic review was designed to summarize and analyse all published literature on strategies to prevent pressure injuries caused by masks in patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation. The protocol of the systematic review followed the PRISMA guideline. An extensive search from the beginning to May 16, 2023, using current articles in databases such as Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library was conducted. Medical Subject Headings (MESH) were used as follows: "Pressure Injury," "Noninvasive Ventilation," "Prevention," and "Pressure Sore." Any language-published studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. A risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool, including evaluation methodologies for all studies. Database searches yielded 2546 articles, which were reduced to 23 that met our criteria after reviewing full texts. A narrative synthesis was conducted. As a result, type of interface (14 studies), dressings (4 studies), adjustment of mask leakage (1 study), humidity (1 study), positioning (1 study), and design of personalized masks (2 studies) seem to be a practical approach to prevent pressure injuries caused by masks in patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation. The results of our study show the effectiveness of preventive methods in reducing the incidence of pressure injuries caused by masks. Given the significant occurrence of pressure injury related to noninvasive ventilation and the crucial role of prevention and treatment, it is imperative to conduct more rigorous studies to ascertain the efficacy of each strategy.
无创通气接口是非医源性压力损伤的主要原因之一。在讨论无创通气引起的压力损伤时,预防仍然是最佳措施。本系统评价旨在总结和分析所有已发表的关于预防无创通气患者面罩引起压力损伤的策略的文献。系统评价的方案遵循 PRISMA 指南。从 2023 年 5 月 16 日开始,使用 Web of Science(WOS)、Scopus、PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 等数据库中的当前文章进行了广泛的搜索。使用以下医学主题词(MESH)进行搜索:“压力损伤”、“无创通气”、“预防”和“压疮”。本综述纳入了符合纳入标准的任何语言发表的研究。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所工具进行偏倚风险评估,包括对所有研究的评估方法。数据库检索产生了 2546 篇文章,在全文审查后,将其减少到 23 篇符合我们标准的文章。进行了叙述性综合。结果表明,接口类型(14 项研究)、敷料(4 项研究)、调整面罩漏出量(1 项研究)、湿度(1 项研究)、体位(1 项研究)和个性化面罩设计(2 项研究)似乎是预防无创通气患者面罩引起压力损伤的实用方法。本研究结果表明,预防方法可有效降低面罩引起的压力损伤的发生率。鉴于与无创通气相关的压力损伤发生率很高,且预防和治疗至关重要,因此必须进行更严格的研究,以确定每种策略的疗效。