Suppr超能文献

形象地寻找特征。

Finding features, figuratively.

作者信息

Solomon Sarah H, Thompson-Schill Sharon L

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, 425 S. University Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018, United States.

University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, 425 S. University Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018, United States.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2017 Nov;174:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

Abstract

Object concepts refer to unique clusters of properties that can be selectively activated or inhibited depending on what information is currently relevant. This conceptual "stretching" enables limitless new meanings to be generated, and figurative language provides a useful framework in which to study this conceptual flexibility. Here we probe the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying the comprehension of novel metaphors as a means of understanding the conceptual flexibility inherent to language processing more generally. We show that novel metaphor comprehension involves the activation or inhibition of conceptual properties that are either relevant or irrelevant to the metaphor, and that left inferior frontal gyrus is recruited in this process, supporting a role for this region in the fine-tuning of conceptual meaning. Our results are consistent with a flexible, compositional account of conceptual structure in which semantic control mechanisms operate over conceptual properties during figurative language comprehension in order to create context-dependent meaning.

摘要

客体概念指的是独特的属性集群,这些属性可以根据当前相关的信息被选择性地激活或抑制。这种概念上的“延伸”能够产生无限的新意义,而比喻性语言提供了一个有用的框架来研究这种概念灵活性。在这里,我们探究理解新颖隐喻背后的认知和神经机制,以此作为更全面理解语言处理中固有概念灵活性的一种方式。我们表明,对新颖隐喻的理解涉及激活或抑制与隐喻相关或不相关的概念属性,并且在这个过程中左额下回会被调动起来,这支持了该区域在概念意义微调中的作用。我们的结果与一种灵活的、组合性的概念结构解释相一致,即在比喻性语言理解过程中,语义控制机制对概念属性进行操作,以创造依赖于语境的意义。

相似文献

1
Finding features, figuratively.
Brain Lang. 2017 Nov;174:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
2
Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty.
Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):375-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
3
Creating metaphors: the neural basis of figurative language production.
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90(100):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.046. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
4
Does simile comprehension differ from metaphor comprehension? A functional MRI study.
Brain Lang. 2012 Jun;121(3):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
5
Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words.
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1432-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
7
Time to Throw in the Towel? No Evidence for Automatic Conceptual Metaphor Access in Idiom Processing.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Oct;49(5):885-913. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09728-1.
8
Decomposing metaphor processing at the cognitive and neural level through functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Brain Res Bull. 2011 Oct 10;86(3-4):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
9
Differential bilateral involvement of the parietal gyrus during predicative metaphor processing: an auditory fMRI study.
Brain Lang. 2014 Oct;137:112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
10
Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese.
Brain Lang. 2007 Feb;100(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

2
Feature Uncertainty Predicts Behavioral and Neural Responses to Combined Concepts.
J Neurosci. 2020 Jun 17;40(25):4900-4912. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-19.2020. Epub 2020 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Competition between Mutually Exclusive Object States in Event Comprehension.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Dec;27(12):2324-38. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00866. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
2
Semantic variability predicts neural variability of object concepts.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Sep;76:41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.029. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
3
The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: evidence from masked priming ERP.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 4;8:583. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00583. eCollection 2014.
4
The Role of Suppression and Enhancement in Understanding Metaphors.
J Mem Lang. 2001 Oct 1;45(3):433-450. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2782.
5
Creating Concepts from Converging Features in Human Cortex.
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Sep;25(9):2584-93. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu057. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
6
A cortical network for the encoding of object change.
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Apr;25(4):884-94. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht275. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
7
Manual experience shapes object representations.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):909-19. doi: 10.1177/0956797612464658. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
8
Looking at the brains behind figurative language--a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing.
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2669-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
9
The effect of object state-changes on event processing: do objects compete with themselves?
J Neurosci. 2012 Apr 25;32(17):5795-803. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6294-11.2012.
10
From novel to familiar: tuning the brain for metaphors.
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3212-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.079. Epub 2011 Dec 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验