Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
J Neurosci. 2020 Jun 17;40(25):4900-4912. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-19.2020. Epub 2020 May 13.
The cognitive and neural structure of conceptual knowledge affects how concepts combine in language and thought. Examining the principles by which individual concepts (e.g., diamond, baseball) combine into more complex phrases (e.g., "baseball diamond") can illuminate not only how the brain combines concepts but also the key ingredients of conceptual structure. Here we specifically tested the role of feature uncertainty in the modulation of conceptual brightness evoked by adjective-noun combinations (e.g., "dark diamond") in male and female human subjects. We collected explicit ratings of conceptual brightness for 45 noun concepts and their "dark" and "light" combinations, resulting in a measure reflecting the degree of conceptual brightness modulation in each noun concept. Feature uncertainty was captured in an entropy measure, as well as in a predictive Bayesian model of feature modulation. We found that feature uncertainty (i.e., entropy) and the Bayesian model were both strong predictors of these behavioral effects. Using fMRI, we observed the neural responses evoked by the concepts and combinations in ROIs. Feature uncertainty predicted univariate responses in left inferior frontal gyrus, and multivariate responses in left anterior temporal lobe were predicted by degree of conceptual brightness modulation. These findings suggest that feature uncertainty is a key ingredient of conceptual structure, and inform cognitive neuroscience theories of conceptual combination by highlighting the role of left inferior frontal gyrus and left anterior temporal lobe in the process of flexible feature modulation during comprehension of complex language. The meaning of a word depends on the words surrounding it. The challenge of understanding how flexible meaning emerges in language can be simplified by studying adjective-noun phrases. We tested whether the uncertainty of a feature (i.e., brightness) in a given noun concept (e.g., diamond) influences how the adjective and noun concepts combine. We analyzed feature uncertainty using two probabilistic measures, and found that feature uncertainty predicted people's explicit interpretations of adjective-noun phrases (e.g., "dark diamond"). Using fMRI, we found that combined concepts evoked responses in left inferior frontal gyrus and left anterior temporal lobe that related to our measures of feature modulation and uncertainty. These findings reveal the cognitive and neural processes supporting conceptual combination and complex language use.
概念知识的认知和神经结构影响概念在语言和思维中的组合方式。研究个体概念(例如,钻石,棒球)如何组合成更复杂的短语(例如,“棒球场”)的原则不仅可以阐明大脑如何组合概念,还可以阐明概念结构的关键要素。在这里,我们专门测试了特征不确定性在调节形容词-名词组合(例如,“黑钻石”)所引起的概念亮度中的作用,在男性和女性人类受试者中进行了测试。我们收集了 45 个名词概念及其“暗”和“亮”组合的概念亮度的明确评分,得出了一个反映每个名词概念的概念亮度调制程度的度量。特征不确定性是通过熵度量以及特征调制的预测贝叶斯模型来捕获的。我们发现,特征不确定性(即熵)和贝叶斯模型都是这些行为效应的强有力预测指标。使用 fMRI,我们观察了概念和组合在 ROI 中引起的神经反应。特征不确定性预测了左侧下额叶皮层的单变量反应,而概念亮度调制程度预测了左前颞叶的多变量反应。这些发现表明,特征不确定性是概念结构的关键要素,并通过突出左下额叶皮层和左前颞叶在理解复杂语言过程中灵活特征调制中的作用,为认知神经科学的概念组合理论提供了信息。一个词的意思取决于它周围的词。理解灵活的意义如何在语言中出现的挑战可以通过研究形容词-名词短语来简化。我们测试了给定名词概念(例如,钻石)中的特征(即亮度)的不确定性是否会影响形容词和名词概念的组合方式。我们使用了两种概率度量来分析特征不确定性,并发现特征不确定性预测了人们对形容词-名词短语的明确解释(例如,“黑钻石”)。使用 fMRI,我们发现组合概念在左下额叶皮层和左前颞叶中引起了与我们的特征调制和不确定性度量相关的反应。这些发现揭示了支持概念组合和复杂语言使用的认知和神经过程。