• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独生子女比有兄弟姐妹的孩子更容易超重或肥胖吗?中国一孩政策对儿童肥胖的影响。

Are single children more likely to be overweight or obese than those with siblings? The influence of China's one-child policy on childhood obesity.

机构信息

Systems-oriented Global Childhood Obesity Intervention Program, Fisher Institute of Health and Well-being, College of Health, Ball State University, USA; Systems-oriented Global Childhood Obesity Intervention Program, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, USA; Systems-oriented Global Childhood Obesity Intervention Program, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.018
PMID:28739490
Abstract

China's one-child policy (1979-2015) has affected Chinese parenting practices and children's health behaviors and also may have contributed to increased childhood obesity. However, very limited research has investigated the association between one-child policy and childhood obesity. We examined characteristics of single-child families and the influence of one-child policy (indicated by single-child status) on children's weight status and related health behaviors. Data from children aged 6-18years old in the 2011 (n=1580) and 2000 (n=2317) China Health and Nutrition Survey were cross-sectionally analyzed with multilevel models. From 2000 to 2011, the rates about doubled for being a single-child (30.1% to 57.0%) and being overweight or obese (OWB, 6.6% to 16.5%) along with urbanization (27.5% to 37.1%). Single-child families had higher levels of parental education, household income and urban residence than families with ≥ two children (p<0.05). Compared to the children with siblings, single children were more likely to be OWB; the association became stronger over time (OR=4.5 (1.7-12.4) in 2011 and 1.7 (1.0-2.8) in 2000). Also, single children had less recreational screen time, but similar physical activity levels; however single urban children were more likely to have excess total energy intake (OR=5.70 (1.58-20.60)) than those with siblings. Being single-child is about four times more likely to be overweight/obesity than those having siblings, and the association became stronger over time in China. China's one-child policy might have contributed to its rising childhood obesity rates. Obesity intervention programs may need to account for the influence of the one-child policy in China.

摘要

中国的独生子女政策(1979-2015 年)影响了中国父母的育儿方式和儿童的健康行为,也可能导致儿童肥胖率上升。然而,关于独生子女政策与儿童肥胖之间的关联,研究非常有限。本研究旨在探讨独生子女家庭的特征以及独生子女政策(以独生子女身份表示)对儿童体重状况和相关健康行为的影响。本研究使用多水平模型对 2011 年(n=1580)和 2000 年(n=2317)中国健康与营养调查中 6-18 岁儿童的数据进行了横断面分析。从 2000 年到 2011 年,独生子女(30.1%至 57.0%)和超重或肥胖(OWB,6.6%至 16.5%)以及城市化(27.5%至 37.1%)的比例几乎翻了一番。与有≥两个孩子的家庭相比,独生子女家庭的父母受教育程度、家庭收入和城镇居住水平更高(p<0.05)。与有兄弟姐妹的儿童相比,独生子女更有可能超重/肥胖;这种关联随着时间的推移而增强(2011 年的比值比[OR]为 4.5(1.7-12.4),2000 年的 OR 为 1.7(1.0-2.8))。此外,独生子女的娱乐屏幕时间较少,但体育活动水平相似;然而,与有兄弟姐妹的儿童相比,城市独生儿童摄入的总能量过多的可能性更大(OR=5.70(1.58-20.60))。与有兄弟姐妹的儿童相比,独生子女超重/肥胖的可能性高出约四倍,而且这种关联随着时间的推移在中国变得更强。中国的独生子女政策可能导致其儿童肥胖率上升。肥胖干预计划可能需要考虑中国独生子女政策的影响。

相似文献

1
Are single children more likely to be overweight or obese than those with siblings? The influence of China's one-child policy on childhood obesity.独生子女比有兄弟姐妹的孩子更容易超重或肥胖吗?中国一孩政策对儿童肥胖的影响。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
2
One-child policy, weight status, lifestyles and parental concerns in Chinese children: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.一孩政策、体重状况、生活方式和中国儿童父母的担忧:全国性横断面调查。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Aug;72(8):1150-1158. doi: 10.1038/s41430-018-0178-y. Epub 2018 May 11.
3
China's one-child policy and overweight children in the 1990s.中国的独生子女政策与20世纪90年代的超重儿童。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 May;64(10):2043-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.024. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
4
Are only children in China more likely to be obese/overweight than their counterparts with siblings?中国的独生子女比有兄弟姐妹的同龄人更有可能肥胖/超重吗?
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100847. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100847. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
5
Family planning and child mental health in China: the Nanjing Survey.中国的计划生育与儿童心理健康:南京调查
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Nov;145(11):1396-403. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.11.1396.
6
The role of grandparents in childhood obesity in China - evidence from a mixed methods study.祖父母在中国儿童肥胖问题中的作用——来自一项混合方法研究的证据
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jun 30;12:91. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0251-z.
7
The impact of maternal employment on children's adiposity: Evidence from China's labor policy reform.母亲就业对儿童肥胖的影响:来自中国劳动政策改革的证据。
Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e236-e255. doi: 10.1002/hec.3498. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
What factors may contribute to sex differences in childhood obesity prevalence in China?哪些因素可能导致中国儿童肥胖患病率的性别差异?
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(11):2056-2064. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000290. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Parenting practices and overweight status of junior high school students in China: A nationally representative study of 19,487 students from 112 schools.中国初中生的养育实践和超重状况:来自 112 所学校的 19487 名学生的全国代表性研究。
Prev Med. 2018 Feb;107:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
10
Family and neighborhood correlates of overweight and obesogenic behaviors among Chinese children.中国儿童超重和致肥胖行为的家庭和邻里相关因素。
Int J Behav Med. 2014 Aug;21(4):700-9. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9333-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and changes of childhood overweight across China and its provinces from 2000 to 2030.2000年至2030年中国及其各省儿童超重的患病率及变化情况。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01813-6.
2
Interaction effect of mobile gaming addiction and excessive sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on overweight and obesity among schoolchildren: Evidence from a large population-based study in Guangzhou, China.移动游戏成瘾与过量饮用含糖饮料对小学生超重和肥胖的交互作用:来自中国广州一项基于大规模人群研究的证据
J Behav Addict. 2025 Jan 24;14(1):323-334. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00086. Print 2025 Mar 28.
3
Sibship Composition and BMI Z-Score Among Saudi Preschoolers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
沙特学龄前儿童的同胞组成与BMI Z评分:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Mar 19;16(3):e56485. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56485. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Overweight and obesity: The serious challenge faced by Chinese children and adolescents.超重与肥胖:中国儿童和青少年面临的严峻挑战。
J Glob Health. 2023 Jul 21;13:03036. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.03036.
5
Fertility desire among HIV-positive individuals in the Chinese sociocultural context: A qualitative study.中国社会文化背景下HIV阳性个体的生育意愿:一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 May 31;12:156. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_126_23. eCollection 2023.
6
Trends of obesity and overweight among children and adolescents in China.中国儿童和青少年肥胖和超重趋势。
World J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;19(12):1115-1126. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00709-7. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
The independent and combined effects of single-child status and ideal lifestyle on clustered cardio-metabolic risk factors among Chinese children and adolescents.独生子女身份和理想生活方式对中国儿童及青少年聚集性心血管代谢危险因素的独立及联合影响。
Front Nutr. 2022 Aug 29;9:987334. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.987334. eCollection 2022.
8
Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study.独生子女与非独生子女的近距工作活动和光轴长度的差异:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03586-7.
9
Exploring the Associations between Single-Child Status and Childhood High Blood Pressure and the Mediation Effect of Lifestyle Behaviors.探讨独生子女身份与儿童期高血压之间的关联及生活方式行为的中介作用。
Nutrients. 2022 Jan 24;14(3):500. doi: 10.3390/nu14030500.
10
Grandparental care and childhood obesity in China.中国的祖父母照料与儿童肥胖问题
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Dec 16;17:101003. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101003. eCollection 2022 Mar.