Lotem Arnon, Halpern Joseph Y, Edelman Shimon, Kolodny Oren
Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7915-7922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620742114. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
When humans and other animals make cultural innovations, they also change their environment, thereby imposing new selective pressures that can modify their biological traits. For example, there is evidence that dairy farming by humans favored alleles for adult lactose tolerance. Similarly, the invention of cooking possibly affected the evolution of jaw and tooth morphology. However, when it comes to cognitive traits and learning mechanisms, it is much more difficult to determine whether and how their evolution was affected by culture or by their use in cultural transmission. Here we argue that, excluding very recent cultural innovations, the assumption that culture shaped the evolution of cognition is both more parsimonious and more productive than assuming the opposite. In considering how culture shapes cognition, we suggest that a process-level model of cognitive evolution is necessary and offer such a model. The model employs relatively simple coevolving mechanisms of learning and data acquisition that jointly construct a complex network of a type previously shown to be capable of supporting a range of cognitive abilities. The evolution of cognition, and thus the effect of culture on cognitive evolution, is captured through small modifications of these coevolving learning and data-acquisition mechanisms, whose coordinated action is critical for building an effective network. We use the model to show how these mechanisms are likely to evolve in response to cultural phenomena, such as language and tool-making, which are associated with major changes in data patterns and with new computational and statistical challenges.
当人类和其他动物进行文化创新时,他们也会改变自身环境,从而施加新的选择压力,这些压力可能会改变他们的生物特征。例如,有证据表明人类的奶牛养殖有利于成年乳糖耐受性的等位基因。同样,烹饪的发明可能影响了颌骨和牙齿形态的进化。然而,当涉及到认知特征和学习机制时,要确定它们的进化是否以及如何受到文化或文化传播中使用方式的影响则困难得多。在这里,我们认为,除了非常近期的文化创新外,文化塑造认知进化的假设比相反的假设更简洁且更具成效。在考虑文化如何塑造认知时,我们认为认知进化的过程级模型是必要的,并提供了这样一个模型。该模型采用了相对简单的学习和数据获取协同进化机制,共同构建了一个先前已证明能够支持一系列认知能力的复杂网络。认知的进化,以及文化对认知进化的影响,是通过对这些协同进化的学习和数据获取机制进行微小修改来体现的,它们的协同作用对于构建一个有效的网络至关重要。我们使用该模型来展示这些机制可能如何响应文化现象(如语言和工具制造)而进化,这些文化现象与数据模式的重大变化以及新的计算和统计挑战相关联。