Ganie Zahoor A, Jhala Amit J
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, LincolnNE, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jul 10;8:1207. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01207. eCollection 2017.
Glyphosate-resistant (GR) giant ragweed is a problematic broadleaf weed in crops including maize and soybean in the Midwestern United States. Commercialization of crops with 2,4-D or dicamba and glufosinate resistance will allow post-emergence (POST) applications of these herbicides. Therefore, information is needed on how 2,4-D/dicamba will interact with glufosinate in various rate combinations. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the interaction of glufosinate plus 2,4-D and/or dicamba for control of GR giant ragweed, and to determine their effect on GR giant ragweed density, biomass, maize injury, and yield. Field experiments were conducted in 2013 and 2014 in a field infested with GR giant ragweed in Nebraska, United States. The treatments included POST applications of glufosinate (450 or 590 g ai ha), 2,4-D, or dicamba at 280 or 560 g ae ha applied alone and in tank-mixtures in glufosinate-resistant maize. The results showed that dicamba applied alone resulted in 56 to 62% and 73 to 83% control at 14 and 28 days after treatment (DAT), respectively, and ≥95% control at 60 DAT or at harvest compared to 17 to 30% and 57 to 73% control with 2,4-D applied alone at 280 and 560 g ai ha, respectively. Glufosinate tank-mixed with 2,4-D and/or dicamba consistently provided ≥89% control of GR giant ragweed, except that control with glufosinate plus 2,4-D varied from 80 to 92% at 60 DAT and at harvest. The comparison between the observed and expected control (determined by Colby's equation) suggested an additive interaction between glufosinate and 2,4-D or dicamba for control of GR giant ragweed. Contrast analysis also indicated that GR giant ragweed control with glufosinate plus 2,4-D or dicamba was either consistently higher or comparable with individual herbicides excluding 2,4-D applied alone. Herbicide programs, excluding 2,4-D at 280 g ae ha, resulted in ≥80% reduction in GR giant ragweed density. Tank-mixing glufosinate with 2,4-D or dicamba showed an additive effect and will be an additional tool with two effective modes of action for the management of GR giant ragweed in maize.
抗草甘膦(GR)的豚草是美国中西部包括玉米和大豆在内的农作物中一种棘手的阔叶杂草。具有2,4 - D或麦草畏以及草铵膦抗性的作物商业化种植将允许在苗后(POST)施用这些除草剂。因此,需要了解2,4 - D/麦草畏与草铵膦以各种配比组合时的相互作用情况。本研究的目的是评估草铵膦与2,4 - D和/或麦草畏组合对GR豚草的防除效果,并确定它们对GR豚草密度、生物量、玉米损伤和产量的影响。2013年和2014年在美国内布拉斯加州一块受GR豚草侵染的田地进行了田间试验。处理包括在抗草铵膦玉米田中苗后施用草铵膦(450或590克有效成分/公顷)、2,4 - D或麦草畏,施用量分别为280或560克酸当量/公顷,单独施用以及桶混施用。结果表明,单独施用麦草畏在处理后14天(DAT)和28天分别实现了56%至62%和73%至83%的防除效果,在60 DAT或收获时防除效果≥95%;相比之下,单独施用2,4 - D,施用量为280和560克有效成分/公顷时,在处理后14天和28天的防除效果分别为17%至30%和57%至73%。草铵膦与2,4 - D和/或麦草畏桶混施用始终能实现≥89%的GR豚草防除效果,不过草铵膦与2,4 - D桶混在60 DAT和收获时的防除效果为80%至92%。观察到的防除效果与预期防除效果(由科尔比方程确定)之间的比较表明,草铵膦与2,4 - D或麦草畏在防除GR豚草方面存在加成相互作用。对比分析还表明,草铵膦与2,4 - D或麦草畏组合对GR豚草的防除效果要么始终高于单独使用除草剂(不包括单独施用2,4 - D),要么与之相当。除了280克酸当量/公顷施用2,4 - D的除草剂方案外,其他方案使GR豚草密度降低了≥80%。草铵膦与2,4 - D或麦草畏桶混表现出加成效应,将成为在玉米田中管理GR豚草的一种具有两种有效作用方式的额外工具。