• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SIRS, qSOFA, and organ failure for assessing sepsis at the emergency department.

作者信息

Andaluz David, Ferrer Ricard

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Department of Intensive Care, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun;9(6):1459-1462. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.36.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2017.05.36
PMID:28740658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5506158/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
SIRS, qSOFA, and organ failure for assessing sepsis at the emergency department.用于急诊科评估脓毒症的全身炎症反应综合征、快速序贯器官功能衰竭评分及器官功能衰竭
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun;9(6):1459-1462. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.36.
2
Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身炎症反应综合征对急诊科脓毒症的预测比较。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
4
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
5
Comparison of QSOFA score and SIRS criteria as screening mechanisms for emergency department sepsis.QSOFA评分与全身炎症反应综合征（SIRS）标准作为急诊科脓毒症筛查机制的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;35(11):1730-1733. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Comparison of SIRS, qSOFA, and NEWS for the early identification of sepsis in the Emergency Department.比较 SIRS、qSOFA 和 NEWS 在急诊科早期识别脓毒症中的作用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1490-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.058. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
8
Comparison of Sepsis-3 Criteria Versus SIRS Criteria in Screening Patients for Sepsis in the Emergency Department.急诊科中采用脓毒症3.0标准与全身炎症反应综合征（SIRS）标准筛查脓毒症患者的比较
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2018 Apr/Jun;40(2):138-143. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000187.
9
Screening for sepsis: SIRS or qSOFA? A literature review.脓毒症筛查：全身炎症反应综合征（SIRS）还是快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）？文献综述
Emerg Nurse. 2019 Nov 5;27(6):13-18. doi: 10.7748/en.2019.e1939. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
10
The Combined SIRS + qSOFA (qSIRS) Score is More Accurate Than qSOFA Alone in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Surgical Sepsis in an LMIC Emergency Department.联合 SIRS + qSOFA（qSIRS）评分比单独 qSOFA 更能准确预测中低收入国家急诊外科脓毒症患者的死亡率。
World J Surg. 2020 Jan;44(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05181-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Lactate-enhanced-qSOFA (LqSOFA) score as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis.乳酸增强型快速序贯器官衰竭评估（LqSOFA）评分作为脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测指标：系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 24;51(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02757-8.
2
Combining C-reactive protein and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) to improve prognostic accuracy for sepsis and mortality in adult inpatients: A systematic review.联合C反应蛋白与快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）以提高成年住院患者脓毒症及死亡率的预后预测准确性：一项系统综述
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 20;6(4):e1229. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1229. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Does lactate enhance the prognostic accuracy of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for adult patients with sepsis? A systematic review.乳酸是否能提高脓毒症成人患者快速序贯器官衰竭评估的预后准确性？系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 21;12(10):e060455. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060455.
4
Risk prediction of biomarkers for early multiple organ dysfunction in critically ill patients.危重病患者早期多器官功能障碍生物标志物的风险预测。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 8;21(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00534-z.
5
Utilization of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in predicting mortality among geriatric patients with influenza in the emergency department.利用全身炎症反应综合征标准预测急诊科老年流感患者的死亡率。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 19;19(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4288-5.
6
Bedside-measurement of serum cholinesterase activity predicts patient morbidity and length of the intensive care unit stay following major traumatic injury.床边测量血清胆碱酯酶活性可预测严重创伤后患者的发病率和重症监护病房住院时间。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 18;9(1):10437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46995-y.
7
Quick-SOFA score to predict mortality among geriatric patients with influenza in the emergency department.应用快速序贯器官衰竭评估（Quick-SOFA）评分预测急诊科老年流感患者的死亡率
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15966. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015966.
8
Severe imported malaria in an intensive care unit: A case series.重症监护病房中的严重输入性疟疾：病例系列
IDCases. 2019 Apr 30;17:e00544. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2019.e00544. eCollection 2019.
9
[Assessment of the severity scores in patients included in a sepsis code in an Emergency Departament].[急诊科脓毒症代码纳入患者的严重程度评分评估]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2018 Aug;31(4):316-322. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Raising concerns about the Sepsis-3 definitions.对 Sepsis-3 定义提出担忧。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jan 25;13:6. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0165-6. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Superior accuracy of mid-regional proadrenomedullin for mortality prediction in sepsis with varying levels of illness severity.中段前肾上腺髓质素在不同疾病严重程度的脓毒症中预测死亡率的准确性更高。
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0238-9. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
2
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
3
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
4
Combining quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment with plasma lactate concentration is comparable to standard Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting mortality of patients with and without suspected infection.将快速序贯器官衰竭评估与血浆乳酸浓度相结合，在预测有或无疑似感染患者的死亡率方面，与标准序贯器官衰竭评估评分相当。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
5
New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make.新的脓毒症标准：一项我们不应做出的改变。
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1117-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.653. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
7
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估：针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
8
Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations.评估全球医院治疗脓毒症的发病率和死亡率。当前的估计和局限性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):259-72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC.
9
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis.全身性炎症反应综合征标准在严重脓毒症中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1629-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
10
An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in the Sepsis Occurrence In Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) study.急性病患者脓毒症发生率（SOAP）研究中全身炎症反应综合征体征的评估。
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Mar;32(3):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0039-8. Epub 2006 Feb 15.