Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 3286, Kigali, Rwanda.
Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1426-1.
In low-resource settings, access to emergency cesarean section is associated with various delays leading to poor neonatal outcomes. In this study, we described the delays a mother faces when needing emergency cesarean delivery and assessed the effect of these delays on neonatal outcomes in Rwanda.
This retrospective study included 441 neonates and their mothers who underwent emergency cesarean section in 2015 at three district hospitals in Rwanda. Four delays were measured: duration of labor prior to hospital admission, travel time from health center to district hospital, time from admission to surgical incision, and time from decision for emergency cesarean section to surgical incision. Neonatal outcomes were categorized as unfavorable (APGAR <7 at 5 min or death) and favorable (alive and APGAR ≥7 at 5 min). We assessed the relationship between each type of delay and neonatal outcomes using multivariate logistic regression.
In our study, 9.1% (40 out of 401) of neonates had an unfavorable outcome, 38.7% (108 out of 279) of neonates' mothers labored for 12-24 h before hospital admission, and 44.7% (159 of 356) of mothers were transferred from health centers that required 30-60 min of travel time to reach the district hospital. Furthermore, 48.1% (178 of 370) of cesarean sections started within 5 h after hospital admission and 85.2% (288 of 338) started more than 30 min after the decision for cesarean section was made. Neonatal outcomes were significantly worse among mothers with more than 90 min of travel time from the health center to the district hospital compared to mothers referred from health centers located on the same compound as the hospital (aOR = 5.12, p = 0.02). Neonates with cesarean deliveries starting more than 30 min after decision for cesarean section had better outcomes than those starting immediately (aOR = 0.32, p = 0.04).
Longer travel time between health center and district hospital was associated with poor neonatal outcomes, highlighting a need to decrease barriers to accessing emergency maternal services. However, longer decision to incision interval posed less risk for adverse neonatal outcome. While this could indicate thorough pre-operative interventions including triage and resuscitation, this relationship should be studied prospectively in the future.
在资源匮乏的环境中,紧急剖宫产的实施存在各种延误,导致新生儿结局较差。本研究旨在描述母亲在需要紧急剖宫产时所面临的各种延误,并评估这些延误对卢旺达新生儿结局的影响。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2015 年在卢旺达三家地区医院接受紧急剖宫产的 441 名新生儿及其母亲。共测量了 4 种延误:从入院前到医院的分娩时间、从中心卫生院到地区医院的交通时间、从入院到手术切口的时间、从决定行紧急剖宫产到手术切口的时间。新生儿结局分为不良(5 分钟时 APGAR 评分<7 或死亡)和良好(存活且 5 分钟时 APGAR 评分≥7)。我们使用多变量逻辑回归评估每种类型的延误与新生儿结局之间的关系。
在本研究中,9.1%(40/401)的新生儿结局不良,38.7%(108/279)的新生儿母亲在入院前分娩 12-24 小时,44.7%(159/356)的母亲从中心卫生院转院,需要 30-60 分钟的交通时间才能到达地区医院。此外,48.1%(178/370)的剖宫产术在入院后 5 小时内开始,85.2%(288/338)在决定行剖宫产术 30 分钟后开始。与从医院所在大院的卫生院转诊的母亲相比,从中心卫生院转院的母亲交通时间超过 90 分钟,其新生儿结局显著更差(aOR=5.12,p=0.02)。与立即开始剖宫产相比,在决定行剖宫产术 30 分钟后开始剖宫产的新生儿结局更好(aOR=0.32,p=0.04)。
卫生院与地区医院之间的交通时间延长与新生儿结局不良相关,这突出表明需要减少获得紧急产妇服务的障碍。然而,更长的决策到切口间隔对不良新生儿结局的风险较小。虽然这可能表明术前干预措施全面,包括分诊和复苏,但这种关系应在未来进行前瞻性研究。