Suppr超能文献

使用靶向新一代测序技术检测晚期胃癌内镜活检样本中的基因组改变。

Genomic alterations in advanced gastric cancer endoscopic biopsy samples using targeted next-generation sequencing.

作者信息

Ge Sai, Li Beifang, Li Yanyan, Li Zhongwu, Liu Zhentao, Chen Zuhua, Wu Jian, Gao Jing, Shen Lin

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and InstituteBeijing 100142, China.

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and InstituteBeijing 100142, China.

出版信息

Am J Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 1;7(7):1540-1553. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) remains the second tumor caused death threat worldwide, and personalized medicine for GC is far from expectation. Finding novel, recurrently mutated genes through next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful and productive approach. However, previous genomic data for GC are based on surgical resected samples while a large proportion of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients have already missed the chance for operation. The aim of this study is to assess frequent genomic alteration in AGC via biopsy samples. Here we performed targeted genomic sequencing of 78 AGC patients' tumor biopsies along with matched lymphocyte samples based on a 118 cancer related gene panel. In total, we observed 301 somatic nonsynonymous genomic alterations in 92 different genes, as well as 37 copy number gain events among 15 different genes (fold change 2-12), and validated the fold changes of copy number gains with IHC and FISH test showed an accuracy of 81.8%. Previously reported driver genes for gastric cancer (, and ), and several unreported mutations (, and ) showed high non-silent mutation prevalence (7.7%-34.6%). When comparing intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC) with diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC), and appear to be more frequently mutated in IGC (=0.028 and =0.023, respectively), whereas and mutations are not observed in IGC, but have 12.8%, 7.7% and 7.7% mutation rates, respectively, in DGC patients. Patients with one or more mutations in adherens junction pathway ( and ) or TGF-β signaling pathway () showed significantly better overall survival (=0.007 and =0.014, respectively), consistent with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort data. Importantly, 57 (73.1%) patients harbored at least one genomic alteration with potential treatments, making NGS-based drug target screening a viable option for AGC patients. Our study established a comprehensive genomic portrait of AGC, and identified several mutation signatures highly associated with clinical features, survival outcomes, which may be used to design future personalized treatments.

摘要

胃癌(GC)仍是全球导致死亡威胁的第二大肿瘤,而针对GC的个性化医疗远未达到预期。通过下一代测序(NGS)发现新的、反复突变的基因是一种强大且有效的方法。然而,先前的GC基因组数据基于手术切除样本,而很大一部分晚期胃癌(AGC)患者已经错失手术机会。本研究的目的是通过活检样本评估AGC中频繁的基因组改变。在此,我们基于一个包含118个癌症相关基因的面板,对78例AGC患者的肿瘤活检样本以及匹配的淋巴细胞样本进行了靶向基因组测序。总共,我们在92个不同基因中观察到301个体细胞非同义基因组改变,以及15个不同基因中的37个拷贝数增加事件(倍数变化为2至12),并通过免疫组化(IHC)和荧光原位杂交(FISH)试验验证了拷贝数增加的倍数变化,显示准确率为81.8%。先前报道的胃癌驱动基因( ,以及 ),以及几个未报道的突变( ,以及 )显示出较高的非沉默突变发生率(7.7% - 34.6%)。当比较肠型胃癌(IGC)与弥漫型胃癌(DGC)时, 和 在IGC中似乎更频繁发生突变(分别为 = 0.028和 = 0.023),而在IGC中未观察到 和 突变,但在DGC患者中分别有12.8%、7.7%和7.7%的突变率。在黏着连接通路( 和 )或转化生长因子 - β信号通路( )中有一个或多个突变的患者总体生存率显著更好(分别为 = 0.007和 = 0.014),这与癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)队列数据一致。重要的是,57例(73.1%)患者至少有一个具有潜在治疗方法的基因组改变,这使得基于NGS的药物靶点筛选成为AGC患者的一个可行选择。我们的研究建立了AGC的全面基因组图谱,并鉴定了几个与临床特征、生存结果高度相关的突变特征,这可能用于设计未来的个性化治疗方案。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Genomic Landscape of Late-Stage Gastric Cancer: Analysis From KEYNOTE-059, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-062 Studies.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Mar;9:e2400456. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00456. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
5
Detection of genomic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 across gastric cancer patients using next generation sequencing.
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7898-7910. doi: 10.62347/MRIE2131. eCollection 2024.
7
Antibrush Border Antibody Disease: A Case Series.
Kidney Med. 2024 May 17;6(7):100841. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100841. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Novel KMT2B gene mutation in MUC4 positive low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma.
Diagn Pathol. 2024 Feb 12;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13000-024-01458-5.
10
Identification of lymph node metastasis-related genes and patterns of immune infiltration in colon adenocarcinoma.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 16;12:907464. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.907464. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Targeted Therapies for Esophagogastric Cancer.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2017 Apr;26(2):293-312. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2016.10.002.
2
The NF1 gene in tumor syndromes and melanoma.
Lab Invest. 2017 Feb;97(2):146-157. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2016.142. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
3
BRAF mutation may have different prognostic implications in early- and late-stage colorectal cancer.
Med Oncol. 2016 May;33(5):39. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0756-6. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
Age-related mutations and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Leukemia. 2016 Apr;30(4):906-13. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.337. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
6
DGIdb 2.0: mining clinically relevant drug-gene interactions.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1036-44. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1165. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Next-generation sequencing to guide cancer therapy.
Genome Med. 2015 Jul 29;7(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0203-x. eCollection 2015.
9
Polymerase Slippage Restoration of Frameshifted TGFBR2 in Colorectal Cancer: A Novel Paradigm.
Gastroenterology. 2015 Jun;148(7):1276-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
10
Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes.
Nat Med. 2015 May;21(5):449-56. doi: 10.1038/nm.3850. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验