Moon Hae, Choi Ji Eun, Lee In Joon, Kim Tae Hyun, Kim Seong Hoon, Ko Young Hwan, Kim Hyun Boem, Nam Byung-Ho, Park Joong-Won
Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov;143(11):2327-2339. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2480-9. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
In clinical practice, most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma require subsequent treatments for remaining, progressing, or recurring tumors. We investigated all-treatment array and outcomes in an HCC cohort from initial diagnosis to death.
We enrolled 1687 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent initial diagnosis and treatment at the National Cancer Center, Korea, from January 2004 to December 2009.
In total, 1357 patients (80.4%) showed RPRTs during median 20.4-month follow-up. Initial transplantation resulted in the least rate (32.3%) of RPRTs. Median treatment frequency was 3.0 times (range 1-20) and 382 patients (27.3%) received treatments ≥6 times. The median treatment frequency was different based on four factors (p < 0.05): age, tumor stage, tumor type and initial treatment modality. Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0 received less frequent treatments. As the stage progressed from 0 to B, the median treatment frequency increased. Radiofrequency ablation as initial treatment was associated with the longest median treatment interval at 19.0 weeks, followed by resection at 14.1 weeks. The median treatment interval was significantly shorter as the stage progressed (p < 0.01). TACE was most frequently performed for RPRTs; the median number of subsequent TACE was 3 (range 1-19). Subsequent treatment array was very heterogeneous, and no certain pattern was found.
Our findings suggest that the survival outcome of patients with HCC is based on the results of cumulative multiple treatments rather than an initial treatment. It is time to consider prospective studies evaluating sequential treatment array of HCC.
在临床实践中,大多数肝细胞癌患者需要对残留、进展或复发的肿瘤进行后续治疗。我们调查了一个肝癌队列从初始诊断到死亡的所有治疗方案及结果。
我们纳入了2004年1月至2009年12月在韩国国立癌症中心接受初始诊断和治疗的1687例连续的肝癌患者。
在中位20.4个月的随访期间,共有1357例患者(80.4%)出现复发性经皮射频热凝治疗(RPRT)。初始移植导致RPRT的发生率最低(32.3%)。中位治疗频率为3.0次(范围1 - 20次),382例患者(27.3%)接受了≥6次治疗。中位治疗频率因四个因素而异(p < 0.05):年龄、肿瘤分期、肿瘤类型和初始治疗方式。巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期为0期的患者接受治疗的频率较低。随着分期从0期进展到B期,中位治疗频率增加。以射频消融作为初始治疗,中位治疗间隔最长,为19.0周,其次是切除,为14.1周。随着分期进展,中位治疗间隔显著缩短(p < 0.01)。经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)最常用于RPRT;后续TACE的中位次数为3次(范围1 - 19次)。后续治疗方案非常多样化,未发现特定模式。
我们的研究结果表明,肝癌患者的生存结果基于累积多次治疗的结果而非初始治疗。是时候考虑开展评估肝癌序贯治疗方案的前瞻性研究了。